Plasma homocysteine levels and Alzheimer's Disease: A systematic review

Objective. To systematically review studies published in English on the relationship between plasma total homocysteine (Hcy) levels and the clinical and/or postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in subjects who are over 60 years old.^ Method. Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO and Academic Search Premier, were searched by using the keywords "homocysteine", "Alzheimer disease" and "dementia", and "cognitive disorders". In addition, relevant articles in PubMed using the "related articles" link and by cross-referencing were identified. The study design, study setting and study population, sample size, the diagnostic criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA), and description of how Hcy levels were measured or defined had to have been clearly stated. Empirical investigations reporting quantitative data on the epidemiology of the relationship between plasma total Hcy (exposure factor) and AD (outcome) were included in the systematic review.^ Results. A total of 7 studies, which included a total of 2,989 subjects, out of 388 potential articles met the inclusion criteria: four case control and three cohort studies were identified. All 7 studies had association statistics, such as the odds ratio (OR), the relative rates (RR), and the hazard ratio (HR) of AD, examined using multivariate and logistic regression analyses. Three case - comparison studies: Clarke et al. (1998) (OR: 4.5, 95% CI.: 2.2 - 9.2); McIlroy et al. (2002) (OR: 2.9, 95% CI.: 1.00–8.1); Quadri et al. (2004) (OR: 3.7, 95% CI.: 1.1 - 13.1), and two cohort studies: Seshadri et al. (2002) (RR: 1.8, 95% CI.: 1.3 - 2.5); Ravaglia et al. (2005) (HR: 2.1, 95% CI.: 1.7 - 3.8) found a significant association between serum total Hcy and AD. One case-comparison study, Miller et al. (2002) (OR: 2.2, 95% C.I.: 0.3 -16), and one cohort study, Luchsinger et al. (2004) (HR: 1.4, 95% C.I.: 0.7 - 2.3) failed to reject H0.^ Conclusions. The purpose of this review is to provide a thorough analysis of studies that examined the relationship between Hcy levels and AD. Five studies showed a positive statistically significant association between elevated total Hcy values and AD but the association was not statistically significant in two studies. Further research is needed in order to establish evidence of the strong, consistent association between serum total Hcy and AD as well as the presence of the appropriate temporal relationship. To answer these questions, it is important to conduct more prospective studies that examine the occurrence of AD in individuals with and without elevated Hcy values at baseline. In addition, the international standardization of measurements and cut-off points for plasma Hcy levels across laboratories is a critical issue to be addressed for the conduct of future studies on the topic.^

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Evaluation with the Radiological Physics Center Head and Neck Phantom

Validation of treatment plan quality and dose calculation accuracy is essential for new radiotherapy techniques, including volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). VMAT delivers intensity modulated radiotherapy treatments while simultaneously rotating the gantry, adding an additional level of complexity to both the dose calculation and delivery of VMAT treatments compared to static gantry IMRT. The purpose of this project was to compare two VMAT systems, Elekta VMAT and Varian RapidArc, to the current standard of care, IMRT, in terms of both treatment plan quality and dosimetric delivery accuracy using the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) head and neck (H&N) phantom. Clinically relevant treatment plans were created for the phantom using typical prescription and dose constraints for Elekta VMAT (planned with Pinnacle3 Smart Arc) and RapidArc and IMRT (both planned with Eclipse). The treatment plans were evaluated to determine if they were clinically comparable using several dosimetric criteria, including ability to meet dose objectives, hot spots, conformity index, and homogeneity index. The planned treatments were delivered to the phantom and absolute doses and relative dose distributions were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and radiochromic film, respectively. The measured and calculated doses of each treatment were compared to determine if they were clinically acceptable based upon RPC criteria of ±7% dose difference and 4 mm distance-to-agreement. Gamma analysis was used to assess dosimetric accuracy, as well. All treatment plans were able to meet the dosimetric objectives set by the RPC and had similar hot spots in the normal tissue. The Elekta VMAT plan was more homogenous but less conformal than the RapidArc and IMRT plans. When comparing the measured and calculated doses, all plans met the RPC ±7%/4 mm criteria. The percent of points passing the gamma analysis for each treatment delivery was acceptable. Treatment plan quality of the Elekta VMAT, RapidArc and IMRT treatments were comparable for consistent dose prescriptions and constraints. Additionally, the dosimetric accuracy of the Elekta VMAT and RapidArc treatments was verified to be within acceptable tolerances.