1 resultado para repeat procedure
em Digital Repository at Iowa State University
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (20)
- ARCA - Repositório Institucional da FIOCRUZ (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (231)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (15)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (44)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (86)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (32)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (58)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (18)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (16)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (8)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (3)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (12)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (8)
- Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia - Portugal (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (52)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (86)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (6)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (40)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (3)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (79)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (4)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (33)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
Resumo:
Two feedlot trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding frequency (once daily in the morning, once daily in the afternoon or twice daily) and feeding level (ad libitum, 95% of ad libitum, or 90% of ad libitum) on the feedlot performance and carcass composition of beef steers. Data were collected using 196 yearling beef steers. In both trials cattle fed once daily in the morning tended to have higher gains and better feed efficiencies than cattle fed once daily in the afternoon or cattle fed twice daily. Overall, cattle restricted to 95% and 90% of ad libitum intake levels had better feed efficiencies than cattle with ad libitum access to feed. Cattle fed once daily in the morning tended to have less backfat than cattle fed once daily in the afternoon or cattle fed twice daily.