1 resultado para orthodontic anchorage procedure
em Digital Repository at Iowa State University
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (20)
- Aquatic Commons (5)
- Archive of European Integration (95)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (36)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (12)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (110)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (31)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (23)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (18)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (58)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (35)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (7)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (16)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (68)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (68)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (221)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (5)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (16)
Resumo:
Two feedlot trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of feeding frequency (once daily in the morning, once daily in the afternoon or twice daily) and feeding level (ad libitum, 95% of ad libitum, or 90% of ad libitum) on the feedlot performance and carcass composition of beef steers. Data were collected using 196 yearling beef steers. In both trials cattle fed once daily in the morning tended to have higher gains and better feed efficiencies than cattle fed once daily in the afternoon or cattle fed twice daily. Overall, cattle restricted to 95% and 90% of ad libitum intake levels had better feed efficiencies than cattle with ad libitum access to feed. Cattle fed once daily in the morning tended to have less backfat than cattle fed once daily in the afternoon or cattle fed twice daily.