Brain Regulation of Growth in Beef Calves

Small peptide hormones produced in the lower part of the brain (hypothalamus) regulate episodic and basal secretion of hormones from the anterior pituitary gland that affect metabolism and growth in cattle. This study focused on long-term growth in young calves subjected to hypophysectomy (HYPOX), hypophyseal stalk transection (HST), and sham operation control (SOC). Crossbred (Hereford x Aberdeen Angus) and Hereford, and Aberdeen Angus calves were HYPOX (n = 5), HST (n = 5), or SOC (n = 8) at 146 days of age, whereas another group was HST (n = 5) or SOC (n = 7) at 273 days of age. Body weight was determined every 21 days from birth to 1008 days of age. From day 146-1008, growth was arrested (P < 0.001) in HYPOX (0.06 kg/day) compared with SOC (0.50 kg/day) calves. Growth continued but at a significantly lower rate (P < 0.05) in calves HST at 146 days (0.32 kg/day) and 273 days (0.32 kg/day) compared with SOC (0.50 kg/day). Although episodic growth hormone (GH) secretion was abolished and peripheral blood serum GH concentration remained consistently lower in HST calves (2.4 ng/ml) than in the SOC (5.5 ng/ml; P < 0.01), the calves continued to grow throughout 1008 days. Peripheral serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration was less (P < 0.05) in HST compared with SOC calves. There was an abrupt decrease (P < 0.001) in serum thyroxine (T4) (4-fold) and triiodothyronine (T3) (3-fold) concentration after surgery that remained to 360 days in HST compared with SOC calves. At sacrifice, pituitary gland weight was markedly reduced (P < 0.001) in HST (0.18 g/100 kg body weight) compared with SOC (0.55 g/100 kg body weight) calves. Histological examination of pituitary glands from HST calves indicated the persistence of secretory GH and TSH cells in the same areas of the anterior pituitary gland as SOC calves. Coronal sections of the gland revealed GH and TSH secreting cells in HST calves that were similar to the controls. These results indicate that long-term growth continues, but at a slower rate, after hypophyseal stalk transection of immature calves in spite of complete abolition of episodic GH secretion and consistently decreased basal secretion of GH, TSH, T4, and T3 compared with sham-operated animals. Growth was abolished after hypophysectomy of immature calves in which circulating GH and TSH was undetectable.

Critical Control Points for Profitability in the Cow-Calf Enterprise

Financial, economic, and biological data collected from cow-calf producers who participated in the Illinois and Iowa Standardized Performance Analysis (SPA) programs were used in this study. Data used were collected for the 1996 through 1999 calendar years, with each herd within year representing one observation. This resulted in a final database of 225 observations (117 from Iowa and 108 from Illinois) from commercial herds with a range in size from 20 to 373 cows. Two analyses were conducted, one utilizing financial cost of production data, the other economic cost of production data. Each observation was analyzed as the difference from the mean for that given year. The independent variable utilized in both the financial and economic models as an indicator of profit was return to unpaid labor and management per cow (RLM). Used as dependent variables were the five factors that make up total annual cow cost: feed cost, operating cost, depreciation cost, capital charge, and hired labor, all on an annual cost per cow basis. In the economic analysis, family labor was also included. Production factors evaluated as dependent variables in both models were calf weight, calf price, cull weight, cull price, weaning percentage, and calving distribution. Herd size and investment were also analyzed. All financial factors analyzed were significantly correlated to RLM (P < .10) except cull weight, and cull price. All economic factors analyzed were significantly correlated to RLM (P < .10) except calf weight, cull weight and cull price. Results of the financial prediction equation indicate that there are eight measurements capable of explaining over 82 percent of the farm-to-farm variation in RLM. Feed cost is the overriding factor driving RLM in both the financial and economic stepwise regression analyses. In both analyses over 50 percent of the herd-to-herd variation in RLM could be explained by feed cost. Financial feed cost is correlated (P < .001) to operating cost, depreciation cost, and investment. Economic feed cost is correlated (P < .001) with investment and operating cost, as well as capital charge. Operating cost, depreciation, and capital charge were all negatively correlated (P < .10) to herd size, and positively correlated (P < .01) to feed cost in both analyses. Operating costs were positively correlated with capital charge and investment (P < .01) in both analyses. In the financial regression model, depreciation cost was the second critical factor explaining almost 9 percent of the herd-to-herd variation in RLM followed by operating cost (5 percent). Calf weight had a greater impact than calf price on RLM in both the financial and economic regression models. Calf weight was the fourth indicator of RLM in the financial model and was similar in magnitude to operating cost. Investment was not a significant variable in either regression model; however, it was highly correlated to a number of the significant cost variables including feed cost, depreciation cost, and operating cost (P < .001, financial; P < .10, economic). Cost factors were far more influential in driving RLM than production, reproduction, or producer controlled marketing factors. Of these cost factors, feed cost had by far the largest impact. As producers focus attention on factors that affect the profitability of the operation, feed cost is the most critical control point because it was responsible for over 50 percent of the herd-to-herd variation in profit.