1 resultado para validity
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (16)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (12)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (57)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (16)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (143)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (14)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (14)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (55)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (405)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (36)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (5)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (7)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (5)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (19)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (35)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
This study examines the question of whether the journal ranking VHB-JOURQUAL 2 can be considered as a good measure for the construct “scientific quality”. Various rankings in business research provide the database for the analysis. The correlations between theses rankings are used to assess the validity of VHB-JOURQUAL 2 along various validity criteria. The correlations with rankings that measure the same construct based on different methods show that VHB-JOURQUAL 2 has acceptable, but moderate convergent validity. The validity varies considerably across disciplines, showing that the heterogeneity of business administration is not sufficiently represented by this overall ranking. The variability is related to the variation in members per discipline represented by the German Association for Business Research. Furthermore, the measure shows a weak correlation with acceptance rates as an indicator of nomological validity in some disciplines.