1 resultado para semi-Markov decision process
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (5)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (7)
- Aston University Research Archive (31)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (16)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (10)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (5)
- CaltechTHESIS (7)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (62)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (5)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (55)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (3)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (12)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (3)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (14)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (16)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (79)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (5)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (43)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (227)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (34)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (7)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (19)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (6)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (18)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (6)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (10)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (5)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (23)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (10)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
The central question for this paper is how to improve the production process by closing the gap between industrial designers and software engineers of television(TV)-based User Interfaces (UI) in an industrial environment. Software engineers are highly interested whether one UI design can be converted into several fully functional UIs for TV products with different screen properties. The aim of the software engineers is to apply automatic layout and scaling in order to speed up and improve the production process. However, the question is whether a UI design lends itself for such automatic layout and scaling. This is investigated by analysing a prototype UI design done by industrial designers. In a first requirements study, industrial designers had created meta-annotations on top of their UI design in order to disclose their design rationale for discussions with software engineers. In a second study, five (out of ten) industrial designers assessed the potential of four different meta-annotation approaches. The question was which annotation method industrial designers would prefer and whether it could satisfy the technical requirements of the software engineering process. One main result is that the industrial designers preferred the method they were already familiar with, which therefore seems to be the most effective one although the main objective of automatic layout and scaling could still not be achieved.