1 resultado para cultural policy, participatory planning, Cajicá
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (8)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (61)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (4)
- Aston University Research Archive (7)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (22)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (27)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (24)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (2)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (3)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (9)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (60)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (270)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (5)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (9)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (3)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (RIUT) (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (19)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (17)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (3)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (3)
- University of Michigan (58)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (84)
- University of Washington (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (4)
Resumo:
Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.