1 resultado para cognitive tests
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (1)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (11)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (20)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (118)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (13)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (25)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (7)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (26)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (44)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (76)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Open University Netherlands (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (185)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (302)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (18)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (4)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (7)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
In this paper, from the perspective of Cognitive Grammar, we consider the question of what kind of verbs can take cognate objects (COs) and what kind of verbs cannot. We investigate the syntactic properties of COs, such as the ability to take modifiers, the passivizability of cognate object constructions (COCs), and the it-pronominalization of COs. It is our contention that a detailed classification of verbs that occur in COCs is required in order to capture the relation between the syntactic properties and the modification of COs. While classifying verbs, we focus on three conceptual factors: the force of energy of the subject, a change of state of the subject, and the objectivity of the cognate noun. The study reveals that these three parameters enable us to capture the difference in the interpretation of COs in relation to modification and syntactic tests.