1 resultado para actions and defences
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- KUPS-Datenbank - Universität zu Köln - Kölner UniversitätsPublikationsServer (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Aquatic Commons (18)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (10)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (6)
- Aston University Research Archive (13)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad del Valle - Colombia (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (51)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (6)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (5)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (30)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (7)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (8)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (7)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (26)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (4)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (10)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (4)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (4)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (28)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (80)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (6)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (13)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (49)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (197)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (6)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (24)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (7)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (41)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (67)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (5)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (20)
- University of Michigan (17)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
The objective of this paper is to discuss EU lobbying in the area of copyright. Legislation needs to regulate the legal position of various different stakeholders in a balanced manner. However, a number of EU copyright provisions brought into effect over recent years were highly controversial and have led to suggestions that powerful lobbying forces may have had some influence. This article investigates the effects of lobbying on copyright law-making in Europe. A specific comparative and multi-faceted analysis is provided of the legislative process for two recently adopted directives: 2011/77/EU which extends the term of protection of sound recordings and 2012/28/EU which introduces certain permitted uses of orphan works (some references are also made to the ACTA case). Firstly, a short presentation is given of the legal bases for the EU consultation process and lobbying. Next, an analysis is provided of the two cases, taking into consideration the policy-making procedures (with special focus on how the consultation process was handled), the legal solutions proposed and adopted and the various stakeholders’ claims. Lastly, it asks why some interest groups were successful and some others failed (the analysis identifies two types of factor for the effectiveness of lobbying: those resulting from stakeholders’ actions and those connected with the consultation process).