Walter Lorenz – Wegbegleiter und Orientierungspunkt in der interkulturellen Sozialen Arbeit

First meeting, common interests and ways together The European Centre for Social Welfare, Training and Research situated in Vienna, was our first meeting place. W. Lorenz was interested in the international comparison of the different concepts and perspectives of social welfare problems in the European countries and the different developments in the training of social professions in Europe. The challenge of intercultural, antiracist social work in the context of Erasmus-Intensive Seminars To organize an intensive seminar with the aim to train students and colleagues for intercultural and antiracist competence in social professions, we formed an European network of European universities and schools of s.w. in Vienna (VIENNET), with the support of ECCE (European Centre of Community Education) in Koblenz. “The group discovered that working on these issues in an international context raises issues of ‘difference’ with renewed acuteness”(cit. W. Lorenz). We learned to cope with a variety of differences: biographical, language, theoretical and institutional backgrounds and discourse traditions. A Venue for an Intensive Seminar In choosing a venue for an Intensive Seminar we were relatively free. We locked for a place, “one dream about”, to support in the best way our seminar aims, to promote a base built on knowledge, skills and values particularly in the area of inner/outer borders, disadvantage, ignorance, minorities, majorities, vulnerable groups, racism and xenophobia. In a small village in Burgenland (Austria), very close to the Hungarian border, we thought to have found it. Future Prospect Are we only representatives of our background institutions or did we act and exposed ourselves as persons with a very specific biography and training experience. Can we sustain this created network, as a network of experts and friends in the field of intercultural, antiracist social work? This question is still open.

Plurilingual Interpretation in WTO Panel and Appellate Body Reports

This article analyzes the extent to which the Appellate Body and WTO panels compare the authentic texts in their examination of the WTO Agreements and the extent to which the parties themselves do so in their arguments. The texts of the WTO Agreements are authentic in English, French and Spanish. Article 33 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties governs the interpretation of treaties authenticated in two or more languages. WTO practice diverges significantly from the rules set out in Article 33 and the travaux préparatoires of the International Law Commission. The terms of a plurilingual treaty are presumed to have the same meaning in each authentic text, which means that a treaty interpreter need not compare the authentic texts as a routine matter as a matter of law. Nevertheless, routine comparison of authentic texts would be good practice in the WTO context, since there are several discrepancies that could affect the interpretation of WTO provisions.

"Évaluer", "accompagner", "contrarier":

Diskutiert werden die Möglichkeiten architektonischen Einfügens anhand der Position, die der französische Architekt Jean Nouvel in Theorie wie Praxis einnimmt. Im Rückblick auf sein Werk zeigt sich dabei, dass er sich von Anbeginn mit der Reflexion über die Möglichkeiten und die Grenzen architektonischen Einfügens in bereits bestehende bauliche Ensembles auseinandergesetzt und eine Reihe von Konzepten entwickelt hat, deren Begrifflichkeit sich an Philosophen wie Félix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze und Michel Foucault orientiert. Die konkrete Anwendung dieser Begriffe wird anhand von zwei Projekten erörtert, die einmal die Einfügung eines kompletten Gebäudeinnern in bereits bestehende Außenwände eines historischen Baus (Oper Lyon), ein anderes Mal die Einfügung eines Neubaus in ein prägnantes, städtebauliches Ensemble (Hotel "Sofitel Vienna Stephansdom“) betreffen.