1 resultado para Technical Standards
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (5)
- Archive of European Integration (83)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (28)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (1)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (97)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (9)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (6)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (29)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (5)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (59)
- Fachlicher Dokumentenserver Paedagogik/Erziehungswissenschaften (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (47)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (33)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (42)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (7)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (7)
- National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR) Reports Repository (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (18)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (17)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (17)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (23)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (5)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (14)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade do Minho (10)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (15)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (107)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (14)
- University of Michigan (54)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (43)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (40)
Resumo:
The UK’s Digital Economy Act 2010 contains measures to enforce copyright on the Internet, specifically a two-tiered form of a graduated response.The Act was challenged in the High Court by two of the UK’s biggest Internet Service Providers (ISP), who obtained a Judicial Review of the copyright enforce- ment provisions. This paper is an overview of the case, based on the hearing of March 2011 and the ensuing judgement. It focuses on the two most hotly contested grounds for the challenge, namely an al- leged failure to notify the European Commission under the Technical Standards Directive, and the pro- portionality or otherwise of the contested provisions. It observes how the judgement accepted the defence argumentation of the government and the copyright owners as interested parties, and how the ISPs appeared to be put on the back foot.