1 resultado para Software compatibility
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (6)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (14)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (9)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (27)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (11)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (9)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (1)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (70)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (63)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (82)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (14)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (3)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (5)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (7)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (22)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (10)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (44)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (11)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (17)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (8)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (116)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (4)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (141)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (125)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (5)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RU-FFYL. Repositorio de la Facultad de Filosofiía y Letras. UNAM. - Mexico (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (8)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (13)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (13)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (45)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (24)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
This article reviews Article 6 of the Software Directive and discusses the need for a revision. Beyond clarification of the scope of the very limited provision on reverse engineering, it seems that the introduction of the clause into copyright was unfortunate. The indirect protection of ideas by prohibiting reverse engineering is foreign to the copyright concept. Permitting reverse engineering altogether would promote research and development and further other goals like ICT security. Innovation would not be retarded, which is the reason why US trade secret law permits reverse engineering based also on economic arguments. The notions of compatibility Article 6 tries to address are better dealt with by Competition Law, which was demonstrated by the Microsoft Decision of the European Court in 2007.