1 resultado para Software Security
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Repository Napier (4)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (14)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (6)
- Aquatic Commons (43)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (31)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (15)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (2)
- Boston University Digital Common (10)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (74)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (1)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (82)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (7)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (5)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (8)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (8)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (25)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (16)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (49)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (11)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (80)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (384)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (4)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (4)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
Resumo:
This article reviews Article 6 of the Software Directive and discusses the need for a revision. Beyond clarification of the scope of the very limited provision on reverse engineering, it seems that the introduction of the clause into copyright was unfortunate. The indirect protection of ideas by prohibiting reverse engineering is foreign to the copyright concept. Permitting reverse engineering altogether would promote research and development and further other goals like ICT security. Innovation would not be retarded, which is the reason why US trade secret law permits reverse engineering based also on economic arguments. The notions of compatibility Article 6 tries to address are better dealt with by Competition Law, which was demonstrated by the Microsoft Decision of the European Court in 2007.