1 resultado para Rhinebeck Bird Club.
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (9)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (5)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (17)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (12)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (4)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (111)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (43)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (47)
- Brock University, Canada (27)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (31)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (35)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (9)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (29)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (14)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (13)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (142)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (8)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (15)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (34)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (34)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (10)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (61)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (3)
- REPOSITORIO DIGITAL IMARPE - INSTITUTO DEL MAR DEL PERÚ, Peru (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (28)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (10)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (9)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (28)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (3)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (16)
Resumo:
One could be seduced into a critique of this volume that focuses on its potential to overstate the momentum for a shift in Western social work ideology when faced with the conundrum of cultural difference. One could posit that the discussion is too broad, the topics covered too numerous, the opportunity for detail missed, the urgency of the messages unnecessarily exaggerated, the “proof” not beyond anecdote and so forth. I reject this temptation to conform to the dominant professional dynamic most emphatically and offer that what Gray, Coates and Yellow Bird have presented to the social work field in this volume is the first tangible step towards an alternative paradigm for an occupation afflicted with unsustainable hypocrisy and thus at the brink of irrelevancy.