Visualisierung und Virtualisierung von Erinnerung: Geschichtspolitik in der medialen Erlebnisgesellschaft. Skizze des Teilprojekts E 11 im Sonderforschungsbereich "Erinnerungskulturen" an der Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen

Erinnerungen sind abhängig von der gesellschaftlichen Organisation ihrer Weitergabe und von den dabei genutzten Medien. Deshalb stehen jetzt vermehrt Einflüsse und Wirkungen auf der Tagesordnung, die neue, computervermittelte Medien auf Erinnerungskulturen haben. Die mnemotechnische Relevanz bildhafter Darstellungen von historischen Ereignissen wird in jüngster Zeit verstärkt analysiert; Visualisierung, vor allem in elektronischen Massenmedien, ist dabei als grundlegende Tendenz einer 'ikonisch' geprägten Öffentlichkeit und (politischen) Kultur herausgestrichen worden. Die Digitalisierung stellt eine neue Dimension dar, die bisher meist nur im Hinblick auf ihre technischen Grundlagen und erhöhte Speicherkapazitäten von Erinnerungs-Informationen thematisiert worden ist. Wenig bearbeitet worden sind ihre dynamischen, multimedialen und interaktiven Dimensionen, die eine neue Qualität der Inszenierung und Fiktionalisierung historischer Ereignisse herstellen. Die bisher erzielten Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass es dabei auch zu einer marktförmigen Strukturierung der Erinnerungskulturen kommt und man etwa unter Gesichtspunkten der Finanzierung von einer (globalen) Wettbewerbssituation im Rahmen von 'public-private-partnerships' ausgehen muss.

Effects of Ownership on Hospital Efficiency in Germany

The objective of our study was to evaluate the efficiency of public, private for-profit, and private non-profit hospitals in Germany. First, bootstrapped data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used to evaluate the efficiency of a panel (n = 1,046) of public, private for-profit, and private non-profit hospitals between 2002 and 2006. This was followed by a second-step truncated linear regression model with bootstrapped DEA efficiency scores as dependent variable. The results show that public hospitals performed significantly better than their private for-profit and non-profit counterparts. In addition, we found a significant positive association between hospital size and efficiency, and that competitive pressure had a significant negative impact on hospital efficiency.

Cut Out By The Middle Man: The Free Speech Implications Of Social Network Blocking and Banning In The EU

This article examines social network users’ legal defences against content removal under the EU and ECHR frameworks, and their implications for the effective exercise of free speech online. A review of the Terms of Use and content moderation policies of two major social network services, Facebook and Twitter, shows that end users are unlikely to have a contractual defence against content removal. Under the EU and ECHR frameworks, they may demand the observance of free speech principles in state-issued blocking orders and their implementation by intermediaries, but cannot invoke this ‘fair balance’ test against the voluntary removal decisions by the social network service. Drawing on practical examples, this article explores the threat to free speech created by this lack of accountability: Firstly, a shift from legislative regulation and formal injunctions to public-private collaborations allows state authorities to influence these ostensibly voluntary policies, thereby circumventing constitutional safeguards. Secondly, even absent state interference, the commercial incentives of social media cannot be guaranteed to coincide with democratic ideals. In light of the blurring of public and private functions in the regulation of social media expression, this article calls for the increased accountability of the social media services towards end users regarding the observance of free speech principles

Governance of Massive Multiauthor Collaboration – Linux, Wikipedia, and Other Networks: Governed by Bilateral Contracts, Partnerships, or Something in Between?

Open collaborative projects are moving to the foreground of knowledge production. Some online user communities develop into longterm projects that generate a highly valuable and at the same time freely accessible output. Traditional copyright law that is organized around the idea of a single creative entity is not well equipped to accommodate the needs of these forms of collaboration. In order to enable a peculiar network-type of interaction participants instead draw on public licensing models that determine the freedoms to use individual contributions. With the help of these access rules the operational logic of the project can be implemented successfully. However, as the case of the Wikipedia GFDL-CC license transition demonstrates, the adaptation of access rules in networks to new circumstances raises collective action problems and suffers from pitfalls caused by the fact that public licensing is grounded in individual copyright. Legal governance of open collaboration projects is a largely unexplored field. The article argues that the license steward of a public license assumes the position of a fiduciary of the knowledge commons generated under the license regime. Ultimately, the governance of decentralized networks translates into a composite of organizational and contractual elements. It is concluded that the production of global knowledge commons relies on rules of transnational private law.