Thermographie zur Temperaturmessung beim Laser-Sintern – ein Beitrag zur Qualitätssicherung?

Beim Laser-Sintern wird das Pulverbett durch Heizstrahler vorgeheizt, um an der Pulveroberfläche eine Temperatur knapp unterhalb des Materialschmelzpunktes zu erzielen. Dabei soll die Temperaturverteilung auf der Oberfläche möglichst homogen sein, um gleiche Bauteileigenschaften im gesamten Bauraum zu erzielen und den Bauteilverzug gering zu halten. Erfahrungen zeigen jedoch sehr inhomogene Temperaturverteilungen, weshalb oftmals die Integration von neuen oder optimierten Prozessüberwachungssystemen in die Anlagen gefordert wird. Ein potentiell einsetzbares System sind Thermographiekameras, welche die flächige Aufnahme von Oberflächentemperaturen und somit Aussagen über die Temperaturen an der Pulverbettoberfläche erlauben. Dadurch lassen sich kalte Bereiche auf der Oberfläche identifizieren und bei der Prozessvorbereitung berücksichtigen. Gleichzeitig ermöglicht die Thermografie eine Beobachtung der Temperaturen beim Lasereingriff und somit das Ableiten von Zusammenhängen zwischen Prozessparametern und Schmelzetemperaturen. Im Rahmen der durchgeführten Untersuchungen wurde ein IR-Kamerasystem erfolgreich als Festeinbau in eine Laser-Sinteranlage integriert und Lösungen für die hierbei auftretenden Probleme erarbeitet. Anschließend wurden Untersuchungen zur Temperaturverteilung auf der Pulverbettoberfläche sowie zu den Einflussfaktoren auf deren Homogenität durchgeführt. In weiteren Untersuchungen wurden die Schmelzetemperaturen in Abhängigkeit verschiedener Prozessparameter ermittelt. Auf Basis dieser Messergebnisse wurden Aussagen über erforderliche Optimierungen getroffen und die Nutzbarkeit der Thermografie beim Laser-Sintern zur Prozessüberwachung, -regelung sowie zur Anlagenwartung als erster Zwischenstand der Untersuchungen bewertet.

Global Standards: Recent Developments betweend the Poles of Privacy and Cloud Computing

The development of the Internet has made it possible to transfer data ‘around the globe at the click of a mouse’. Especially fresh business models such as cloud computing, the newest driver to illustrate the speed and breadth of the online environment, allow this data to be processed across national borders on a routine basis. A number of factors cause the Internet to blur the lines between public and private space: Firstly, globalization and the outsourcing of economic actors entrain an ever-growing exchange of personal data. Secondly, the security pressure in the name of the legitimate fight against terrorism opens the access to a significant amount of data for an increasing number of public authorities.And finally,the tools of the digital society accompany everyone at each stage of life by leaving permanent individual and borderless traces in both space and time. Therefore, calls from both the public and private sectors for an international legal framework for privacy and data protection have become louder. Companies such as Google and Facebook have also come under continuous pressure from governments and citizens to reform the use of data. Thus, Google was not alone in calling for the creation of ‘global privacystandards’. Efforts are underway to review established privacy foundation documents. There are similar efforts to look at standards in global approaches to privacy and data protection. The last remarkable steps were the Montreux Declaration, in which the privacycommissioners appealed to the United Nations ‘to prepare a binding legal instrument which clearly sets out in detail the rights to data protection and privacy as enforceable human rights’. This appeal was repeated in 2008 at the 30thinternational conference held in Strasbourg, at the 31stconference 2009 in Madrid and in 2010 at the 32ndconference in Jerusalem. In a globalized world, free data flow has become an everyday need. Thus, the aim of global harmonization should be that it doesn’t make any difference for data users or data subjects whether data processing takes place in one or in several countries. Concern has been expressed that data users might seek to avoid privacy controls by moving their operations to countries which have lower standards in their privacy laws or no such laws at all. To control that risk, some countries have implemented special controls into their domestic law. Again, such controls may interfere with the need for free international data flow. A formula has to be found to make sure that privacy at the international level does not prejudice this principle.

Missing Links in the Proposed EU Data Protection Regulation and Cloud Computing Scenarios: A Brief Overview

Applying location-focused data protection law within the context of a location-agnostic cloud computing framework is fraught with difficulties. While the Proposed EU Data Protection Regulation has introduced a lot of changes to the current data protection framework, the complexities of data processing in the cloud involve various layers and intermediaries of actors that have not been properly addressed. This leaves some gaps in the regulation when analyzed in cloud scenarios. This paper gives a brief overview of the relevant provisions of the regulation that will have an impact on cloud transactions and addresses the missing links. It is hoped that these loopholes will be reconsidered before the final version of the law is passed in order to avoid unintended consequences.