Medien in der Wissenschaft, Bd. 46: E-Strategy

Die nachhaltige Verankerung von digitalen Medien und Services für Forschung und Lehre ist weiterhin eine große Herausforderung. Unterschiedliche Aktivitäten haben an vielen Hochschulen zu einer Nutzung von digitaler Technologie geführt, ihre flächendeckende Nutzung bleibt jedoch vielfach weiterhin eine einzulösende Vision. Die hierzu ergriffenen Maßnahmen fokussieren einzelne Bereiche, etwa die Kompetenzentwicklung von Lehrenden oder infrastrukturelle Maßnahmen. Es zeigt sich, dass die systematische Integration von digitalen Medien und Services an einer Hochschule ohne die Formulierung einer umfassenden Strategie kaum gelingen wird. In diesem Sammelband beschreiben ausgewählte Autoren die strategischen Bemühungen ihrer Universitäten. Dabei kommen sowohl traditionelle (Präsenz-)Hochschulen wie auch Fern-Universitäten zu Wort. Das Buch richtet sich damit gleichermaßen an Mitglieder des Hochschulmanagements sowie an Entscheider im IKM-Bereich.

Knowledge-Production Processes in Practice Research - Outcomes and Critical Elements

The welfare sector has seen considerable changes in its operational context. Welfare services respond to an increasing number of challenges as citizens are confronted with life’s uncertainties and a variety of complex situations. At the same time the service-delivery system is facing problems of co-operation and the development of staff competence, as well as demands to improve service effectiveness and outcomes. In order to ensure optimal user outcomes in this complex, evolving environment it is necessary to enhance professional knowledge and skills, and to increase efforts to develop the services. Changes are also evident in the new emergent knowledge-production models. There has been a shift from knowledge acquisition and transmission to its construction and production. New actors have stepped in and the roles of researchers are subject to critical discussion. Research outcomes, in other words the usefulness of research with respect to practice development, is a topical agenda item. Research is needed, but if it is to be useful it needs to be not only credible but also useful in action. What do we know about different research processes in practice? What conceptions, approaches, methods and actor roles are embedded? What is the effect on practice? How does ‘here and now’ practice challenge research methods? This article is based on the research processes conducted in the institutes of practice research in social work in Finland. It analyses the different approaches applied by elucidating the theoretical standpoints and the critical elements embedded in them, and reflects on the outcomes in and for practice. It highlights the level of change and progression in practice research, arguing for diverse practice research models with a solid theoretical grounding, rigorous research processes, and a supportive infrastructure.