1 resultado para Indigenous certification mark
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (7)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (44)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (4)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (29)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (42)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (40)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (8)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (15)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (8)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (3)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (18)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (13)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Harvard University (6)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (4)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (30)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (24)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (24)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (7)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (11)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (19)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (12)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (114)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (6)
Resumo:
One could be seduced into a critique of this volume that focuses on its potential to overstate the momentum for a shift in Western social work ideology when faced with the conundrum of cultural difference. One could posit that the discussion is too broad, the topics covered too numerous, the opportunity for detail missed, the urgency of the messages unnecessarily exaggerated, the “proof” not beyond anecdote and so forth. I reject this temptation to conform to the dominant professional dynamic most emphatically and offer that what Gray, Coates and Yellow Bird have presented to the social work field in this volume is the first tangible step towards an alternative paradigm for an occupation afflicted with unsustainable hypocrisy and thus at the brink of irrelevancy.