1 resultado para INSTRUCTORS
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (4)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (3)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (5)
- Brock University, Canada (26)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (5)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (30)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (7)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (44)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (2)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Santarém (4)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (40)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Santarém - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (18)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (6)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (6)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (8)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (4)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (40)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (5)
Resumo:
At IDC, students use electronic resources for research and online interactive communication with instructors, usually in English. This paper discusses preliminary research into the overlap between the informality of e-mail communication between students and instructors and the growing use (or misuse) of e-mail-type informal discourse in formal written legal assignments. Four students were given a hypothetical legal case and requested to write: (a) a formal letter that would be sent by e-mail to one of the parties in the case, and (b) an executive memo e-mail to the senior partner in one of the law firms representing the parties. No instruction was given as to constructing a formal legal letter or an executive memo. In the resulting e-mail communications, many examples of typical informal e-mail shorthand were used. The students were interviewed and were able to locate and change most of the errors in their letters. Several students expressed the belief that this type of “shorthand” is or should be acceptable when the formal message is an e-mail communication.