1 resultado para Fault coverage
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (14)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (3)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (8)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (10)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (46)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (4)
- CaltechTHESIS (6)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (62)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (41)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (31)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (7)
- Digital Archives@Colby (4)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (5)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Duke University (3)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (67)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (7)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (92)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (71)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (96)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (44)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (10)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (36)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (12)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (55)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (60)
- University of Washington (7)
Resumo:
Terrorists, policy-makers, and terrorism scholars have long assumed that the mere threat of terrorist strikes affects societies that have experienced actual acts of terrorism. For this reason, most definitions of terrorism include the threat of violent political acts against civilians. But so far research has neither validated this conventional wisdom nor demonstrated how actual and mass-mediated threat messages by terrorists and terror alerts and threat assessments by government officials affect the public in targeted states. This paper fills the gap providing evidence that who conveys such messages matters and that mass-mediated threat messages by al Qaeda leaders and announced alerts and threat assessments by U.S. administration officials had a significant impact on the American public’s threat perceptions in the post-9/11 years.