1 resultado para Creative learning
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (28)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (4)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (7)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (3)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (221)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (3)
- Georgian Library Association, Georgia (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (24)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (144)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (18)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- Open Access Repository of Association for Learning Technology (ALT) (2)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (7)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (32)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (15)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (11)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (59)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (8)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (12)
- Universidad de Alicante (11)
- Universidade do Minho (30)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (14)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (11)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (43)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (143)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (3)
Resumo:
NBC Universal’s decision to use Creative Commons-licensed photographs in an Olympic broadcast is an example of how media conglomerates are experimenting with collaboration with amateurs, but it also reveals potential problems of letting non-lawyers negotiate copyright licensing agreements. In the process, NBC’s producers nearly opened the door for a multimillion-dollar infringement law suit. To avoid such pitfalls, media companies need to adopt policies and best practices for using amateur licensed works. These guidelines should instruct how a production can attribute collaborating authors and how the Open Content licensing terms affect the licensing of the productions. The guidelines should also instruct how producers can seek alternative licensing arrangements with amateurs and contribute back to the Open Content community.