1 resultado para Constitutional pluralism
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (3)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (30)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (23)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (14)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (114)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (10)
- CaltechTHESIS (3)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (21)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (6)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (32)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (19)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (8)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (8)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (157)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (81)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (6)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (3)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (16)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (5)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (7)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (89)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (160)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (13)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (10)
Resumo:
Taking the South African experience as an example, this article considers the interpretive benefits to be reaped from having access to bi- and multilingual versions of a statutory text. The discussion takes place against the backdrop of a history of statutory bi- and multilingualism in the said jurisdiction as well as, at present, constitutional guarantees of language rights and the “parity of esteem” of eleven official languages. It is argued that, if invoked with due discretion and in a non-rigid way, statutory multilingualism can be a boon to statutory and constitutional interpretation. The South African courts – whose traditional approach to statutory inter-pretation has tended to be literalist, formalistic and formulaic – are, generally speaking, to be commended for their supple use of bilingualism as an aid to interpretation over the years. The advent of constitutional multilingualism and the (potential) availability of statutory texts (and the Constitution) in more than two languages, have moreover created conditions conducive to the further development and refinement of reliance on multilingualism in statutory and constitutional interpretation – certain challenges notwithstanding.