1 resultado para Common Law
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (22)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (10)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (5)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (2)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (11)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (2)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Carolina Law Scholarship Repository (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (24)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (5)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (3)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (58)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (467)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (13)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (6)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad Católica de Colombia (1)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (7)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (40)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (80)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
Resumo:
The article discusses the problems of applicable law to copyright infringements online. It firstly identifies the main problems related to the well established territoriality principle and the lex loci protectionis rules. Then; the discussion focuses on the "ubiquitous infringement" rule recently proposed by the American Law Institute (ALI) and the European Max Planck Group for Conflicts of Law and Intellectual Propoperty (CLIP). The author strongly welcomes a compromise between the territoriality and universality approaches suggested in respect of ubiquitous infringement cases. At the same time; the paper draws the attention that the interests of "good faith" online service providers (such as legal certainty and foreseeability) have been until now underestimated and invites to take these interests into account when merging the projects into a common international proposal.