1 resultado para Bird fleas
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (7)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (23)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (4)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (9)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (9)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (135)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (31)
- Boston University Digital Common (2)
- Brock University, Canada (3)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (30)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (25)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (3)
- Duke University (13)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (18)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (25)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (12)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (14)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (109)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (30)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (100)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (26)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (3)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (133)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (15)
- University of Washington (2)
- USA Library of Congress (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
One could be seduced into a critique of this volume that focuses on its potential to overstate the momentum for a shift in Western social work ideology when faced with the conundrum of cultural difference. One could posit that the discussion is too broad, the topics covered too numerous, the opportunity for detail missed, the urgency of the messages unnecessarily exaggerated, the “proof” not beyond anecdote and so forth. I reject this temptation to conform to the dominant professional dynamic most emphatically and offer that what Gray, Coates and Yellow Bird have presented to the social work field in this volume is the first tangible step towards an alternative paradigm for an occupation afflicted with unsustainable hypocrisy and thus at the brink of irrelevancy.