1 resultado para Art 175 Decreto 019 de 2012
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (6)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Archive of European Integration (6)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (2)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (8)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad del Valle - Colombia (2)
- Biblioteca Digital Loyola - Universidad de Deusto (1)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (16)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (80)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- Cámara de Comercio de Bogotá, Colombia (48)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Harvard University (7)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Línguas & Letras - Unoeste (3)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (36)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (25)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (34)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (12)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (109)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (9)
- Repositorio Institucional UNISALLE - Colombia (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (5)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (88)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (9)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (5)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (20)
- University of Michigan (4)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
With a steady increase of regulatory requirements for business processes, automation support of compliance management is a field garnering increasing attention in Information Systems research. Several approaches have been developed to support compliance checking of process models. One major challenge for such approaches is their ability to handle different modeling techniques and compliance rules in order to enable widespread adoption and application. Applying a structured literature search strategy, we reflect and discuss compliance-checking approaches in order to provide an insight into their generalizability and evaluation. The results imply that current approaches mainly focus on special modeling techniques and/or a restricted set of types of compliance rules. Most approaches abstain from real-world evaluation which raises the question of their practical applicability. Referring to the search results, we propose a roadmap for further research in model-based business process compliance checking.