1 resultado para Air quality management--South Carolina
em Digital Peer Publishing
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (4)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (34)
- Archive of European Integration (7)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (14)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (7)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (23)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (26)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (25)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (17)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (5)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- Duke University (5)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (3)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (3)
- Harvard University (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (2)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (3)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (4)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (5)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (8)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (18)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (34)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (8)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (383)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (16)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (258)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (5)
- USA Library of Congress (5)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Although the effects of quality management on social work are still widely unexplored, critics suspect that it will lead to a negative standardization of working conditions, whereas supporters of quality management hope for a greater transparency and effectiveness of service delivery. This article reports on a survey of 30 managers, 261 professionals, and 435 families in 30 family intervention service organizations. It uses cluster analysis to explore the relationship between quality management and different forms of work formalization. Results showed that working conditions generally are enabling for professional practice, but differences exist between what is called here a managerialist machine bureaucracy, an atomistic professional organization, and a collegiate professional organization.