«Quel spectacle!» Der Tod des Herzogs von Berry und seine melodramatische Bewältigung

Das Attentat auf den Herzog von Berry bedeutete eine Zerreißprobe für das labile Gleichgewicht der französischen Restauration und ließ die virulenten politischen Gegensätze in offene Konflikte ausbrechen. Doch der Tod Berrys war auch eines der großen Medienereignisse der Epoche. Druckgraphiken, Oden und Zeitungsartikel schilderten das Sterben des Herzogs in einem melodramatischen Stil. Die These des Aufsatzes ist, dass diese auf emotionale Identifikation angelegte Darstellungsweise des Ereignisses nicht nur quer zu den politischen Kämpfen lag, sondern auch ein integratives Potential entfaltete, indem sie den Akt der Aggression gegen die Monarchie hinter die Gefühle der beteiligten Personen zurücktreten ließ. Die offizielle Repräsentation der Monarchie war in dem erinnerungspolitischen Dilemma gefangen, der königlichen Opfer revolutionär motivierter Verbrechen gedenken zu müssen, zugleich aber die politische Angreifbarkeit der Monarchie vergessen machen zu wollen. Demgegenüber zeigt die mediale Verarbeitung des Attentats, dass es andere Möglichkeiten monarchischer Selbstinszenierung gegeben hätte, welche dieses Dilemma in den Hintergrund zu drängen vermochten.

Modernity Strikes Back? A Historical Perspective on the Latest Increase in Interpersonal Violence (1960-1990)

There is a plethora of criminological explanations why criminal violence increased during the three decades between the early 1960s and the early 1990s. This paper argues that most available interpretations are lacking in three respects: they lack a historical perspective that anchors the three critical decades in a wider understanding of long-term trends; they take the nation-state as their unit of analysis and disregard important commonalities across the Western world; and they pay insufficient attention to different trends in broad categories of physical violence.This paper therefore takes a macro-level and long-term perspective on violent crime, focussing on European homicide during the past 160 years. It demonstrates that the period of increase was preceded by a long-term decline and convergence of homicide rates from the 1840s to the 1950s. Also, it shows that both the decline and the increase primarily resulted from temporal variation in the likelihood of physical aggression between men in public space. It argues that explanations of these common trends need to take into account broad long-term cultural change common to Western societies. In particular, the paper suggests that shifts in culturally transmitted and institutionally embedded ideals of the conduct of life may provide an explanation for long-term change in levels of interpersonal violence.

The Uses of Violence: An Examination of some Cross-Cutting Issues

A general theory of violence may only be possible in the sense of a meta-theoretical framework, As such it should comprise a parsimonious set of general mechanisms that operate across various manifestations of violence. In order to identify such mechanisms, a general theory of violence needs to equally consider all manifestations of violence, in all societies, and at all times. Departing from this assumption this paper argues that three theoretical approaches may be combined in a non-contradictory way to understand violence as goal-directed instrumental behaviour: a theory of the judgment and decision-making processes operating in the situations that give rise to violence; a theory of the evolutionary processes that have resulted in universal cognitive and emotional mechanisms associated with violence; and a theory of the way in which social institutions structure violence by selectively enhancing its effectiveness for some purposes (i.e legitimate use of force) and controlling other types of violence (i.e crime). To illustrate the potential use of such a perspective the paper then examines some general mechanisms that may explain many different types of violence. In particular, it examines how the mechanisms of moralistic aggression (Trivers) and moral disengagement (Bandura) may account for many different types of violence.

Violence, Crime, and Violent Crime

I propose a dual conceptualization of violent crime. Since violent crime is both violence and crime, theories of aggression and deviance are required to understand it. I argue that both harm-doing and rule breaking are instrumental behaviors and that a bounded rational choice approach can account for both behaviors. However, while some of the causes of harm-doing and deviance (and violent and nonviolent crime) are the same, some are different. Theories of crime and deviance cannot explain why one only observes individual and group differences in violent crime and theories of aggression and violence cannot explain why one observes differences in all types of crimes. Such theories are “barking up the wrong tree.”