1 resultado para physician ratings
em Digital Commons - Montana Tech
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (45)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (17)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (4)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (30)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (10)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (3)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (16)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (14)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (24)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (5)
- Duke University (2)
- Georgian Library Association, Georgia (4)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (5)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS ENERGÉTICAS E NUCLEARES (IPEN) - Repositório Digital da Produção Técnico Científica - BibliotecaTerezine Arantes Ferra (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (17)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (27)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (6)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (7)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (9)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (4)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (24)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (31)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (3)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (4)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (14)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (417)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (2)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Connecticut - USA (5)
- University of Michigan (89)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (96)
Resumo:
Most studies of warning signs involve undergraduate students as subjects. This paper reports a direct comparison of findings from an undergraduate population and an employed population. The 48 employed subjects from this study were compared with 59 undergraduate subjects from a companion study. Subjects from both populations were shown the same signs and asked to rate the severity level connoted by each sign. The signs differed only in signal word. Results for each population indicated that signal word had a highly significant effect on severity ratings. When the two populations were compared for ratings of each signal word, the only significant difference was for Caution. Median ratings of each population were the same: Deadly (4), Danger (3), Warning (2), Caution (1), and Notice (0).