1 resultado para employee voice
em Digital Commons - Montana Tech
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (2)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (4)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (3)
- Aston University Research Archive (49)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (19)
- Brock University, Canada (6)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (22)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (54)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (25)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (161)
- Digital Archives@Colby (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (8)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (9)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (4)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (6)
- Harvard University (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (8)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (6)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (4)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (9)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (91)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (123)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (5)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (2)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (10)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (3)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (221)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (54)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (2)
Resumo:
Most studies of warning signs involve undergraduate students as subjects. This paper reports a direct comparison of findings from an undergraduate population and an employed population. The 48 employed subjects from this study were compared with 59 undergraduate subjects from a companion study. Subjects from both populations were shown the same signs and asked to rate the severity level connoted by each sign. The signs differed only in signal word. Results for each population indicated that signal word had a highly significant effect on severity ratings. When the two populations were compared for ratings of each signal word, the only significant difference was for Caution. Median ratings of each population were the same: Deadly (4), Danger (3), Warning (2), Caution (1), and Notice (0).