1 resultado para RATINGS
em Digital Commons - Montana Tech
Filtro por publicador
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- Aquatic Commons (2)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (7)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (7)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (28)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (9)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (86)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (9)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (16)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Duke University (24)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (11)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (14)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (15)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (6)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (6)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (68)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (244)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (22)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (81)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (3)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (3)
- Scielo España (1)
- SerWisS - Server für Wissenschaftliche Schriften der Fachhochschule Hannover (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (16)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (4)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (21)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (10)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (6)
Resumo:
Most studies of warning signs involve undergraduate students as subjects. This paper reports a direct comparison of findings from an undergraduate population and an employed population. The 48 employed subjects from this study were compared with 59 undergraduate subjects from a companion study. Subjects from both populations were shown the same signs and asked to rate the severity level connoted by each sign. The signs differed only in signal word. Results for each population indicated that signal word had a highly significant effect on severity ratings. When the two populations were compared for ratings of each signal word, the only significant difference was for Caution. Median ratings of each population were the same: Deadly (4), Danger (3), Warning (2), Caution (1), and Notice (0).