1 resultado para Product ratings
em Digital Commons - Montana Tech
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (18)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (2)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (26)
- Aston University Research Archive (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (19)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (25)
- Bibloteca do Senado Federal do Brasil (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (62)
- Brock University, Canada (5)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (67)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (4)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (12)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (7)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (32)
- CUNY Academic Works (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (9)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Knowledge Repository of Central Drug Research Institute (1)
- Digital Peer Publishing (2)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (122)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (15)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (6)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (11)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (49)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (55)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (2)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (2)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (12)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (76)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (26)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (11)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (26)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (5)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (7)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (3)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (25)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (18)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (38)
Resumo:
Most studies of warning signs involve undergraduate students as subjects. This paper reports a direct comparison of findings from an undergraduate population and an employed population. The 48 employed subjects from this study were compared with 59 undergraduate subjects from a companion study. Subjects from both populations were shown the same signs and asked to rate the severity level connoted by each sign. The signs differed only in signal word. Results for each population indicated that signal word had a highly significant effect on severity ratings. When the two populations were compared for ratings of each signal word, the only significant difference was for Caution. Median ratings of each population were the same: Deadly (4), Danger (3), Warning (2), Caution (1), and Notice (0).