1 resultado para Employee Satisfaction
em Digital Commons - Montana Tech
Filtro por publicador
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (24)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (13)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (8)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (79)
- Brock University, Canada (17)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (39)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (2)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (7)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (30)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (5)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (9)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (5)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (43)
- Gallica, Bibliotheque Numerique - Bibliothèque nationale de France (French National Library) (BnF), France (1)
- Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (11)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (48)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (4)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (7)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (16)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (6)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (14)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (1)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (20)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade do Minho (7)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (3)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (4)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (4)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (80)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (42)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (40)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Most studies of warning signs involve undergraduate students as subjects. This paper reports a direct comparison of findings from an undergraduate population and an employed population. The 48 employed subjects from this study were compared with 59 undergraduate subjects from a companion study. Subjects from both populations were shown the same signs and asked to rate the severity level connoted by each sign. The signs differed only in signal word. Results for each population indicated that signal word had a highly significant effect on severity ratings. When the two populations were compared for ratings of each signal word, the only significant difference was for Caution. Median ratings of each population were the same: Deadly (4), Danger (3), Warning (2), Caution (1), and Notice (0).