1 resultado para Cooperative collision warning
em Digital Commons - Montana Tech
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (13)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (2)
- Aquatic Commons (31)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (3)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (5)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (86)
- Boston University Digital Common (4)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (8)
- CaltechTHESIS (6)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (22)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (52)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (53)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (6)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (77)
- Department of Computer Science E-Repository - King's College London, Strand, London (3)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (4)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (2)
- Digital Peer Publishing (3)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (6)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (11)
- Duke University (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (5)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (5)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (95)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (5)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (4)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (41)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (169)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (161)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (6)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (31)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (9)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Most studies of warning signs involve undergraduate students as subjects. This paper reports a direct comparison of findings from an undergraduate population and an employed population. The 48 employed subjects from this study were compared with 59 undergraduate subjects from a companion study. Subjects from both populations were shown the same signs and asked to rate the severity level connoted by each sign. The signs differed only in signal word. Results for each population indicated that signal word had a highly significant effect on severity ratings. When the two populations were compared for ratings of each signal word, the only significant difference was for Caution. Median ratings of each population were the same: Deadly (4), Danger (3), Warning (2), Caution (1), and Notice (0).