1 resultado para C-scan test
em Digital Commons - Montana Tech
Filtro por publicador
- Academic Archive On-line (Stockholm University; Sweden) (1)
- AMS Campus - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (8)
- Aquatic Commons (12)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (6)
- Archive of European Integration (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (39)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (13)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (56)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (4)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (12)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (47)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (31)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (4)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (1)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (10)
- Duke University (4)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (6)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (38)
- Infoteca EMBRAPA (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (1)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (11)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (33)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (15)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (125)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (85)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (34)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (227)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (10)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (10)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (12)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (3)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (8)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (8)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (2)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
Most studies of warning signs involve undergraduate students as subjects. This paper reports a direct comparison of findings from an undergraduate population and an employed population. The 48 employed subjects from this study were compared with 59 undergraduate subjects from a companion study. Subjects from both populations were shown the same signs and asked to rate the severity level connoted by each sign. The signs differed only in signal word. Results for each population indicated that signal word had a highly significant effect on severity ratings. When the two populations were compared for ratings of each signal word, the only significant difference was for Caution. Median ratings of each population were the same: Deadly (4), Danger (3), Warning (2), Caution (1), and Notice (0).