Identifying indicators of sustainable development using the global sustainability quadrant approach

Advances in information technology and global data availability have opened the door for assessments of sustainable development at a truly macro scale. It is now fairly easy to conduct a study of sustainability using the entire planet as the unit of analysis; this is precisely what this work set out to accomplish. The study began by examining some of the best known composite indicator frameworks developed to measure sustainability at the country level today. Most of these were found to value human development factors and a clean local environment, but to gravely overlook consumption of (remote) resources in relation to nature’s capacity to renew them, a basic requirement for a sustainable state. Thus, a new measuring standard is proposed, based on the Global Sustainability Quadrant approach. In a two‐dimensional plot of nations’ Human Development Index (HDI) vs. their Ecological Footprint (EF) per capita, the Sustainability Quadrant is defined by the area where both dimensions satisfy the minimum conditions of sustainable development: an HDI score above 0.8 (considered ‘high’ human development), and an EF below the fair Earth‐share of 2.063 global hectares per person. After developing methods to identify those countries that are closest to the Quadrant in the present‐day and, most importantly, those that are moving towards it over time, the study tackled the question: what indicators of performance set these countries apart? To answer this, an analysis of raw data, covering a wide array of environmental, social, economic, and governance performance metrics, was undertaken. The analysis used country rank lists for each individual metric and compared them, using the Pearson Product Moment Correlation function, to the rank lists generated by the proximity/movement relative to the Quadrant measuring methods. The analysis yielded a list of metrics which are, with a high degree of statistical significance, associated with proximity to – and movement towards – the Quadrant; most notably: Favorable for sustainable development: use of contraception, high life expectancy, high literacy rate, and urbanization. Unfavorable for sustainable development: high GDP per capita, high language diversity, high energy consumption, and high meat consumption. A momentary gain, but a burden in the long‐run: high carbon footprint and debt. These results could serve as a solid stepping stone for the development of more reliable composite index frameworks for assessing countries’ sustainability.

INFLUENCE OF 24-HOUR SLEEP DEPRIVATION ON CARDIOVASCULAR AND NEURAL CONTROL AT REST AND DURING ACUTE STRESS IN HUMANS

Recent epidemiological studies report a consistent association between short sleep and incidence of hypertension, as well as short sleep and cardiovascular disease-related mortality. While the association between short sleep and hypertension appears to be stronger in women than men, the mechanisms underlying the relations between sleep deprivation, stress, risks of cardiovascular diseases, and sex remain unclear. We conducted two studies to investigate the underlying neural mechanisms of these relations. In study 1, we examined sympathetic neural and blood pressure responses to experimentally-induced sleep deprivation in men and women. We further investigated the influence of sleep deprivation on cardiovascular reactivity to acute stress. In study 2, we examined the neural and cardiovascular function throughout the ovarian cycle in sleep deprived women. Twenty-eight young healthy subjects (14men and 14 women) were tested twice in study 1, once after normal sleep (NS) and once after 24-h total sleep deprivation (TSD). We measured the blood pressure, heart rate (HR), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and forearm blood flow (FBF) during 10min baseline, 5min of mental stress (MS) and 2 min cold pressor test (CPT). We demonstrated that TSD increased resting arterial blood pressure to a similar extent in both men and women, but MSNA decreased only in men following TSD. This MSNA response was associated with altered baroreflex function in women and divergent testosterone responses to TSD between men and women. Regarding TSD and cardiovascular reactivity, TSD elicited augmented HR reactivity and delayed recovery during both MS and CPT in men and women, and responses between sexes were not statistically different. Fourteen young healthy women participated in study 2. Subjects were tested twice, once during their early follicular (EF) phase after TSD, once during their mid-luteal (ML) phase after TSD. Blood pressure, HR, MSNA, and FBF were recorded during 10min baseline, 5 min MS, and 2 min CPT. We observed an augmented resting supine blood pressure during EF compared to ML in sleep deprived women. In contrast, resting MSNA, as well as cardiovascular responses to stressors, were similar between EF and ML after TSD. In conclusion, we observed sex differences in MSNA responses to TSD that demonstrate reductions of MSNA in men, but not women. TSD elicited augmented HR reactivity and delayed HR recovery to acute stressors similarly in men and women. We also reported an augmented supine blood pressure during EF compared to ML in sleep deprived women. These novel findings provide new and valuable mechanistic insight regarding the complex and poorly understood relations among sleep deprivation, sex, stress, and risk of cardiovascular disease.