1 resultado para ending work relationship
em Digital Commons - Michigan Tech
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (7)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (45)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (16)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (153)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (16)
- Brock University, Canada (31)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (12)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (6)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (5)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (4)
- Digital Archives@Colby (1)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (26)
- Digital Peer Publishing (8)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (5)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (2)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (3)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (5)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (2)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (1)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (10)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- REPOSITÓRIO ABERTO do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (3)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (6)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (46)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (33)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Digital da UNIVERSIDADE DA MADEIRA - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (32)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (9)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (2)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo España (2)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (33)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (1)
- South Carolina State Documents Depository (3)
- The Scholarly Commons | School of Hotel Administration; Cornell University Research (2)
- Universidad de Alicante (6)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (3)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade do Algarve (1)
- Universidade do Minho (5)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (4)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (13)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Connecticut - USA (2)
- University of Michigan (5)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (265)
- University of Washington (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (1)
Resumo:
In 1906, two American industrialists, John Munroe Longyear and Frederick Ayer, formed the Arctic Coal Company to make the first large scale attempt at mining in the high-Arctic location of Spitsbergen, north of the Norwegian mainland. In doing so, they encountered numerous obstacles and built an organization that attempted to overcome them. The Americans sold out in 1916 but others followed, eventually culminating in the transformation of a largely underdeveloped landscape into a mining region. This work uses John Law’s network approach of the Actor Network Theory (ANT) framework to explain how the Arctic Coal Company built a mining network in this environmentally difficult region and why they made the choices they did. It does so by identifying and analyzing the problems the company encountered and the strategies they used to overcome them by focusing on three major components of the operations; the company’s four land claims, its technical system and its main settlement, Longyear City. Extensive comparison between aspects of Longyear City and the company’s choices of technology with other American examples place analysis of the company in a wider context and helps isolate unique aspects of mining in the high-Arctic. American examples dominate comparative sections because Americans dominated the ownership and upper management of the company.