Use of a 3D perfusion bioreactor with osteoblasts and osteoblast/endothelial cell co-cultures to improve tissue-engineered bone

The delivery of oxygen, nutrients, and the removal of waste are essential for cellular survival. Culture systems for 3D bone tissue engineering have addressed this issue by utilizing perfusion flow bioreactors that stimulate osteogenic activity through the delivery of oxygen and nutrients by low-shear fluid flow. It is also well established that bone responds to mechanical stimulation, but may desensitize under continuous loading. While perfusion flow and mechanical stimulation are used to increase cellular survival in vitro, 3D tissue-engineered constructs face additional limitations upon in vivo implantation. As it requires significant amounts of time for vascular infiltration by the host, implants are subject to an increased risk of necrosis. One solution is to introduce tissue-engineered bone that has been pre-vascularized through the co-culture of osteoblasts and endothelial cells on 3D constructs. It is unclear from previous studies: 1) how 3D bone tissue constructs will respond to partitioned mechanical stimulation, 2) how gene expression compares in 2D and in 3D, 3) how co-cultures will affect osteoblast activity, and 4) how perfusion flow will affect co-cultures of osteoblasts and endothelial cells. We have used an integrated approach to address these questions by utilizing mechanical stimulation, perfusion flow, and a co-culture technique to increase the success of 3D bone tissue engineering. We measured gene expression of several osteogenic and angiogenic genes in both 2D and 3D (static culture and mechanical stimulation), as well as in 3D cultures subjected to perfusion flow, mechanical stimulation and partitioned mechanical stimulation. Finally, we co-cultured osteoblasts and endothelial cells on 3D scaffolds and subjected them to long-term incubation in either static culture or under perfusion flow to determine changes in gene expression as well as histological measures of osteogenic and angiogenic activity. We discovered that 2D and 3D osteoblast cultures react differently to shear stress, and that partitioning mechanical stimulation does not affect gene expression in our model. Furthermore, our results suggest that perfusion flow may rescue 3D tissue-engineered constructs from hypoxic-like conditions by reducing hypoxia-specific gene expression and increasing histological indices of both osteogenic and angiogenic activity. Future research to elucidate the mechanisms behind these results may contribute to a more mature bone-like structure that integrates more quickly into host tissue, increasing the potential of bone tissue engineering.

Adapting health-risk communication to the specific cultural contexts of diverse populations : an assessment of malaria-treatment programs in Liberia

Drawing on theories of technical communication, rhetoric, literacy, language and culture, and medical anthropology, this dissertation explores how local culture and traditions can be incorporated into health-risk-communication-program design and implementation, including the design and dissemination of health-risk messages. In a modern world with increasing global economic partnerships, mounting health and environmental risks, and cross-cultural collaborations, those who interact with people of different cultures have “a moral obligation to take those cultures seriously, including their social organization and values” (Hahn and Inhorn 10). Paradoxically, at the same time as we must carefully adapt health, safety, and environmental-risk messages to diverse cultures and populations, we must also recognize the increasing extent to which we are all becoming part of one, vast, interrelated global village. This, too, has a significant impact on the ways in which healthcare plans should be designed, communicated, and implemented. Because communicating across diverse cultures requires a system for “bridging the gap between individual differences and negotiating individual realities” (Kim and Gudykunst 50), both administrators and beneficiaries of malaria-treatment-and-control programs (MTCPs) in Liberia were targeted to participate in this study. A total of 105 people participated in this study: 21 MTCP administrators (including designers and implementers) completed survey questionnaires on program design, implementation, and outcomes; and 84 MTCP beneficiaries (e.g., traditional leaders and young adults) were interviewed about their knowledge of malaria and methods for communicating health risks in their tribe or culture. All participants showed a tremendous sense of courage, commitment, resilience, and pragmatism, especially in light of the fact that many of them live and work under dire socioeconomic conditions (e.g., no electricity and poor communication networks). Although many MTCP beneficiaries interviewed for this study had bed nets in their homes, a majority (46.34 percent) used a combination of traditional herbal medicine and Western medicine to treat malaria. MTCP administrators who participated in this study rated the impacts of their programs on reducing malaria in Liberia as moderately successful (61.90 percent) or greatly successful (38.10 percent), and they offered a variety of insights on what they might do differently in the future to incorporate local culture and traditions into program design and implementation. Participating MTCP administrators and beneficiaries differed in their understanding of what “cultural incorporation” meant, but they agreed that using local indigenous languages to communicate health-risk messages was essential for effective health-risk communication. They also suggested that understanding the literacy practices and linguistic cultures of the local people is essential to communicating health risks across diverse cultures and populations.