1 resultado para Scotchbond Multi Purpose Plus
em Digital Commons - Michigan Tech
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (12)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (2)
- Aston University Research Archive (17)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (9)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (157)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (63)
- Bioline International (2)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (11)
- CiencIPCA - Instituto Politécnico do Cávado e do Ave, Portugal (5)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (16)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (10)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Instituto Nacional de Saúde de Portugal (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (125)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (2)
- Lume - Repositório Digital da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (3)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (6)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (3)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal do Conhecimento - Ministerio do Ensino Superior Ciencia e Inovacao, Cape Verde (2)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (6)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (3)
- Repositório Aberto da Universidade Aberta de Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (45)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (5)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (2)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Estadual de São Paulo - UNESP (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (66)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (74)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (7)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (20)
- Universidad de Alicante (3)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (2)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (17)
- Universidade de Madeira (1)
- Universidade do Minho (35)
- Universidade dos Açores - Portugal (1)
- Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP) (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (2)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (1)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (26)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (34)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (3)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (67)
- University of Washington (1)
Resumo:
In 1998-2001 Finland suffered the most severe insect outbreak ever recorded, over 500,000 hectares. The outbreak was caused by the common pine sawfly (Diprion pini L.). The outbreak has continued in the study area, Palokangas, ever since. To find a good method to monitor this type of outbreaks, the purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of multi-temporal ERS-2 and ENVISAT SAR imagery for estimating Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) defoliation. Three methods were tested: unsupervised k-means clustering, supervised linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and logistic regression. In addition, I assessed if harvested areas could be differentiated from the defoliated forest using the same methods. Two different speckle filters were used to determine the effect of filtering on the SAR imagery and subsequent results. The logistic regression performed best, producing a classification accuracy of 81.6% (kappa 0.62) with two classes (no defoliation, >20% defoliation). LDA accuracy was with two classes at best 77.7% (kappa 0.54) and k-means 72.8 (0.46). In general, the largest speckle filter, 5 x 5 image window, performed best. When additional classes were added the accuracy was usually degraded on a step-by-step basis. The results were good, but because of the restrictions in the study they should be confirmed with independent data, before full conclusions can be made that results are reliable. The restrictions include the small size field data and, thus, the problems with accuracy assessment (no separate testing data) as well as the lack of meteorological data from the imaging dates.