SO2 emissions at Volcan de Colima, 2003-2007

Volcán de Colima has been continuously erupting since the onset of dome growth in 1998. This period of unrest has had 4 prominent periods; 1998-1999, 2003, 2004-2005, and the current dome growth that began in February of 2007. Each of these episodes was marked by lava extrusion forming a dome and lava flows, followed by explosions that destroyed the dome. The Correlation Spectrometer (COSPEC) was used to determine SO2 emission rates on 164 days from May 2003 to February 2007, using both stationary ground based scans and some flight traverses. Scans were separated into the categories of explosive degassing and passive, or background degassing. These scans show variation in the SO2 flow rate from below detection limit (~3 t/d depending on environmental conditions) during background, passive emissions to a peak of 2949 t/d (34 kilograms/second) during an explosion on 9 October, 2004. Both passive and explosive degassing increased when there was lava extrusion in 2004 and with the increased explosive activity in 2005. These two different processes of degassing wax with each other when activity increases and wane together as well, indicating a parallel cyclicity in the volcanic eruption and degassing rates, where the conduit partially seals (pressurizes) between explosions. Colima’s gas and eruptive behavior is compared to similar systems such as Santiaguito and Soufrière Hills, Montserrat. About 2/3 of Colima’s SO2 degassing, amounting to 1.3 x 105 tonnes in 3.74 yrs has come in short lived small (VEI=0-1) vertical explosions that occurred at the rate of 100-3000explosions/ month, and the remaining third has occured in continuous passive degassing. Colima emits sulfur at a rate equivalent to about 0.04 to 0.08 wt % S, similar to other andesitic convergent plate boundary volcanoes. There has been an explosive destruction of the dome in every cycle for that past 5 years, and it is assumed that the current dome which began growth in February, 2007 (just at the end of this study) will be destroyed. Higher emission rates seen in the quiescence of 2006 may have eased the pressure at the time, resulting in the slow effusion of the current dome and lack of explosivity.

IMPROVED SENSITIVITY OF RESONANT MASS SENSOR BASED ON MICRO TILTING PLATE AND MICRO CANTILEVER

Vapor sensors have been used for many years. Their applications range from detection of toxic gases and dangerous chemicals in industrial environments, the monitoring of landmines and other explosives, to the monitoring of atmospheric conditions. Microelectrical mechanical systems (MEMS) fabrication technologies provide a way to fabricate sensitive devices. One type of MEMS vapor sensors is based on mass changing detection and the sensors have a functional chemical coating for absorbing the chemical vapor of interest. The principle of the resonant mass sensor is that the resonant frequency will experience a large change due to a small mass of gas vapor change. This thesis is trying to build analytical micro-cantilever and micro-tilting plate models, which can make optimization more efficient. Several objectives need to be accomplished: (1) Build an analytical model of MEMS resonant mass sensor based on micro-tilting plate with the effects of air damping. (2) Perform design optimization of micro-tilting plate with a hole in the center. (3) Build an analytical model of MEMS resonant mass sensor based on micro-cantilever with the effects of air damping. (4) Perform design optimization of micro-cantilever by COMSOL. Analytical models of micro-tilting plate with a hole in the center are compared with a COMSOL simulation model and show good agreement. The analytical models have been used to do design optimization that maximizes sensitivity. The micro-cantilever analytical model does not show good agreement with a COMSOL simulation model. To further investigate, the air damping pressures at several points on the micro-cantilever have been compared between analytical model and COMSOL model. The analytical model is inadequate for two reasons. First, the model’s boundary condition assumption is not realistic. Second, the deflection shape of the cantilever changes with the hole size, and the model does not account for this. Design optimization of micro-cantilever is done by COMSOL.