Cloning and characterization of the genes involved in cambial growth in response to elevated [CO2]

Aspen (Populus tremuloides) trees growing under elevated [CO2] at a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) site have produced significantly more biomass compared to control trees. The molecular mechanisms underlying the observed increase in biomass productivity was investigated by producing transcriptomic profiles of the vascular cambium zone (VCZ) and leaves, followed by a comparative study to identify genes and pathways that showed significant changes following long-term exposure to elevated [CO2]. This study is mainly to verify if genetic modification of a few selected candidate genes including CAP1, CKX6, and ASML2 that are expressed in vascular cambium in response to elevated [CO2] can cause the changes in plant growth and development. To this end, these three genes were cloned into both sense and antisense constructs. Then antisense and sense transgenic lines of above-mentioned genes were developed. 15 events were generated for 5 constructs, which were confirmed with regular PCR and RT-PCR. Confirmed plants were planted in greenhouse for growth and phenotypic characterization. The expression of CAP1, CKX6 and ASML2 in antisense plants was measured by real-time RT-PCR, and the changes caused by gene interference in cambial growth were studies by analyzing the microscopic sections made from the antisense transgenic plants. It has been found that 1) CAP1 is mainly expressed in xylem and root. 2) RNAi suppression of CAP1 significantly affected height and diameter. 3) CAP1, ASML2 and CKX6 affected xylem and phloem cell proliferation and elongation. Due to the delay in regenerating sense transgenic plants, the characterization of sense transgenic plants is limited to growth only.

Arrangement of gene pairs, retrotransposon insertions, and regulation of gene expression in plants

Plant genomes are extremely complex. Myriad factors contribute to their evolution and organization, as well as to the expression and regulation of individual genes. Here we present investigations into several such factors and their influence on genome structure and gene expression: the arrangement of pairs of physically adjacent genes, retrotransposons closely associated with genes, and the effect of retrotransposons on gene pair evolution. All sequenced plant genomes contain a significant fraction of retrotransposons, including that of rice. We investigated the effects of retrotransposons within rice genes and within a 1 kb putative promoter region upstream of each gene. We found that approximately one-sixth of all rice genes are closely associated with retrotransposons. Insertions within a gene’s promoter region tend to block gene expression, while retrotransposons within genes promote the existence of alternative splicing forms. We also identified several other trends in retrotransposon insertion and its effects on gene expression. Several studies have previously noted a connection among genes between physical proximity and correlated expression profiles. To determine the degree to which this correlation depends on an exact physical arrangement, we studied the expression and interspecies conservation of convergent and divergent gene pairs in rice, Arabidopsis, and Populus trichocarpa. Correlated expression among gene pairs was quite common in all three species, yet conserved arrangement was rare. However, conservation of gene pair arrangement was significantly more common among pairs with strongly correlated expression levels. In order to uncover additional properties of gene pair conservation and rearrangement, we performed a comparative analysis of convergent, divergent, and tandem gene pairs in rice, sorghum, maize, and Brachypodium. We noted considerable differences between gene pair types and species. We also constructed a putative evolutionary history for each pair, which led to several interesting discoveries. To further elucidate the causes of gene pair conservation and rearrangement, we identified retrotransposon insertions in and near rice gene pairs. Retrotransposon-associated pairs are less likely to be conserved, although there are significant differences in the possible effect of different types and locations of retrotransposon insertions. The three types of gene pair also varied in their susceptibility to retrotransposon-associated evolutionary changes.