1 resultado para Participation in Land Regularization
em Digital Commons - Michigan Tech
Filtro por publicador
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (1)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (6)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (4)
- Archive of European Integration (41)
- Aston University Research Archive (15)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (17)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (1)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library, United States (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (55)
- Brock University, Canada (41)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (2)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (105)
- Claremont University Consortium, United States (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (10)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (30)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (45)
- Cor-Ciencia - Acuerdo de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Córdoba (ABUC), Argentina (2)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (2)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (3)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (2)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (19)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (1)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (18)
- Digitale Sammlungen - Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (17)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (2)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- FUNDAJ - Fundação Joaquim Nabuco (1)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (2)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (9)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (2)
- Nottingham eTheses (2)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (4)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (3)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (4)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (6)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (20)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (15)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (2)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (39)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (2)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade do Minho (6)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (17)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (66)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (18)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (60)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (69)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (3)
- University of Washington (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
Public participation is an important component of Michigan’s Part 632 Nonferrous Mining law and is identified by researchers as important to decision-making processes. The Kennecott Eagle Project, which is located near Marquette, Michigan, is the first mine permitted under Michigan’s new mining regulation, and this research examines how public participation is structured in regulations, how the permitting process occurred during the permitting of the Eagle Project, and how participants in the permitting process perceived their participation. To understand these issues, this research implemented a review of existing mining policy and public participation policy literature, examination of documents related to the Kennecott Eagle Project and completion of semi-structured, ethnographic interviews with participants in the decision-making process. Interviewees identified issues with the structure of participation, the technical nature of the permitting process, concerns about the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality’s (DEQ) handling of mine permitting, and trust among participants. This research found that the permitting of the Kennecott Eagle Mine progressed as structured by regulation and collected technical input on the mine permit application, but did not meet the expectations of some participants who opposed the project. Findings from this research indicated that current mining regulation in Michigan is resilient to public opposition, there is need for more transparency from the Michigan DEQ during the permitting process, and current participatory structures limit the opportunities for some stakeholder groups to influence decision-making.