The long-term effects of whole-tree harvest at final felling on soil properties in a Norway Spruce (Picea Abies (L) Karst.) Stand

Increased demand for forest-derived biomass has resulted in changes in harvest intensities in Finland. Conventional stem-only harvest (CH) has to some extent been replaced with whole-tree harvest (WTH). The latter involves a greater removal of nutrients from the forest ecosystem, as all the above ground biomass is exported from the site. This has raised concerns that WTH could result in large changes in the nutrient dynamics of a forest stand and could eventually lower its site productivity. Little empirical data exists to support this assumption as only a limited number of studies have been conducted on the topic. A majority of these discuss the short-term effects, thus the long-term consequences remain unknown. The objective of this study was to compare differences in soil properties after CH and WTH in a fertile Norway spruce (Picea abies (L) Karst.) stand in Southern Finland. The site was clear-felled in August 2000 and spruce seedlings were planted in the following summer. Soil sampling in the form of systematic randomized sampling was carried out in May 2011. Changes in base saturation, cation exchange capacity, elemental pools (total and exchangeable) and acidity were studied in both organic and mineral horizons. The results indicate that WTH lowered effective cation exchange capacity and base saturation particularly in the humus layer. The pools of exchangeable Al and Fe were increased in the humus layer, whereas the amount of exchangeable Ca decreased in both layers. WTH also resulted in lower Ca/Al-ratios across the sampled layers. Treatment did not have a significant effect on pH, total pools of elements or on the C/N-ratio of the soil. The results suggest that although the stand possesses significant pools of nutrients at present, WTH, if continued, could have long-term effects on site productivity.

BENEFICIATION OF HIGH-MgO SEDIMENTARY PHOSPHATE ORES

Dolomite [CaMg(CO3)2] is an intolerable impurity in phosphate ores due to its MgO content. Traditionally, the Florida phosphate industry has avoided mining high-MgO phosphate reserves due to the lack of an economically viable process for removal of dolomite. However, as the high grade phosphate reserves become depleted, more emphasis is being put on the development of a cost effective method for separating dolomite from high-MgO phosphate ores. In general, the phosphate industry demands a phosphate concentrate containing less than 1%MgO. Dolomite impurities have mineralogical properties that are very similar to the desired phosphate minerals (francolite), making the separation of the two minerals very difficult. Magnesium is primarily found as distinct dolomite-rich pebbles, very fine dolomite inclusions in predominately francolite pebbles, and magnesium substituted into the francolite structure. Jigging is a gravity separation process that attempts to take advantage of the density difference between the dolomite and francolite pebbles. A unique laboratory scale jig was designed and built at Michigan Tech for this study. Through a series of tests it was found that a pulsation rate of 200 pulse/minute, a stroke length of 1 inch, a water addition rate of 0.5gpm, and alumina ragging balls were optimum for this study. To investigate the feasibility of jigging for the removal of dolomite from phosphate ore, two high-MgO phosphate ores were tested using optimized jigging parameters: (1) Plant #1 was sized to 4.00x0.85mm and contained 1.55%MgO; (2) Plant #2 was sized to 3.40mmx0.85mm and contained 3.07% MgO. A sample from each plant was visually separated by hand into dolomite and francolite rich fractions, which were then analyzed to determine the minimum achievable MgO levels. For Plant #1 phosphate ore, a concentrate containing 0.89%MgO was achieved at a recovery of 32.0%BPL. For Plant #2, a phosphate concentrate containing 1.38%MgO was achieved at a recovery of 74.7%BPL. Minimum achievable MgO levels were determined to be 0.53%MgO for Plant #1 and 1.15%MgO for Plant #2.