1 resultado para Content analysis, discourse analysis, mixed-methods research
em Digital Commons - Michigan Tech
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (5)
- Aberdeen University (3)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (5)
- Aquatic Commons (4)
- Archive of European Integration (7)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (24)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (9)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (19)
- Brock University, Canada (15)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Bulgarian Digital Mathematics Library at IMI-BAS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (3)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (24)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (5)
- Coffee Science - Universidade Federal de Lavras (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (16)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (2)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (16)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (136)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (27)
- DigitalCommons - The University of Maine Research (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (2)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (5)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (2)
- Glasgow Theses Service (4)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (36)
- Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship Repository (1)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (2)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (2)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (4)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (7)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (78)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (190)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (6)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (5)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (10)
- Repositório do ISCTE - Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (1)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (13)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (33)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (2)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (2)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Savoirs UdeS : plateforme de diffusion de la production intellectuelle de l’Université de Sherbrooke - Canada (2)
- Scielo España (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (9)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (8)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (3)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (6)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (6)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (21)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (5)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (2)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (24)
- Université Laval Mémoires et thèses électroniques (1)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (2)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (7)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (9)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (6)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (7)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (7)
Resumo:
The climate change narrative has changed from one of mitigation to one of adaptation. Governments around the world have created climate change frameworks which address how the country can better cope with the expected and unexpected changes due to global climate change. In an effort to do so, federal governments of Canada and the United States, as well as some provinces and states within these countries, have created detailed documents which outline what steps must be taken to adapt to these changes. However, not much is mentioned about how these steps will be translated in to policy, and how that policy will eventually be implemented. To examine the ability of governments to acknowledge and incorporate the plethora of scientific information to policy, consideration must be made for policy capacity. This report focuses on three sectors: water supply and demand; drought and flood planning; and forest and grassland ecosystems, and the word ‘capacity’ as related to nine different forms of policy capacity acknowledged in these frameworks. Qualitative content analysis using NVivo was carried out on fifty four frameworks and the results obtained show that there is a greater consideration for managerial capacity compared to analytical or political capacity. The data also indicated that although there were more Canadian frameworks which referred to policy capacity, the frameworks from the United States actually considered policy capacity to a greater degree.