1 resultado para Literature from Santiago del Estero
em Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive
Filtro por publicador
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Academic Archive On-line (Jönköping University; Sweden) (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Adam Mickiewicz University Repository (3)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (7)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (13)
- Aquatic Commons (18)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (18)
- Aston University Research Archive (16)
- Avian Conservation and Ecology - Eletronic Cientific Hournal - Écologie et conservation des oiseaux: (1)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (10)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (2)
- Biblioteca Digital de Artesanías de Colombia (3)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (19)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (3)
- Biblioteca Digital Loyola - Universidad de Deusto (2)
- Biblioteca Valenciana Digital - Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte - Valencia - Espanha (1)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (13)
- Boston University Digital Common (1)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (6)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (14)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (14)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (3)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (1)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (24)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (7)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (2)
- FAUBA DIGITAL: Repositorio institucional científico y académico de la Facultad de Agronomia de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (6)
- Glasgow Theses Service (2)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Harvard University (2)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (4)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (3)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (120)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (43)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (2)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (21)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (6)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (21)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (39)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- RepoCLACAI - Consorcio Latinoamericano Contra el Aborto Inseguro (1)
- Repositorio Académico de la Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica (2)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (2)
- Repositorio de la Universidad de Cuenca (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (3)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Almería (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de El Salvador (3)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Nacional Agraria (1)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (39)
- RIBERDIS - Repositorio IBERoamericano sobre DIScapacidad - Centro Español de Documentación sobre Discapacidad (CEDD) (1)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (1)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Mexico (28)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (178)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (8)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (2)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (5)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (4)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (26)
- University of Connecticut - USA (1)
- University of Michigan (39)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (7)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
- University of Washington (2)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (3)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
A recent article in this journal (Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2: e124) argued that more than half of published research findings in the medical literature are false. In this commentary, we examine the structure of that argument, and show that it has three basic components: 1)An assumption that the prior probability of most hypotheses explored in medical research is below 50%. 2)Dichotomization of P-values at the 0.05 level and introduction of a “bias” factor (produced by significance-seeking), the combination of which severely weakens the evidence provided by every design. 3)Use of Bayes theorem to show that, in the face of weak evidence, hypotheses with low prior probabilities cannot have posterior probabilities over 50%. Thus, the claim is based on a priori assumptions that most tested hypotheses are likely to be false, and then the inferential model used makes it impossible for evidence from any study to overcome this handicap. We focus largely on step (2), explaining how the combination of dichotomization and “bias” dilutes experimental evidence, and showing how this dilution leads inevitably to the stated conclusion. We also demonstrate a fallacy in another important component of the argument –that papers in “hot” fields are more likely to produce false findings. We agree with the paper’s conclusions and recommendations that many medical research findings are less definitive than readers suspect, that P-values are widely misinterpreted, that bias of various forms is widespread, that multiple approaches are needed to prevent the literature from being systematically biased and the need for more data on the prevalence of false claims. But calculating the unreliability of the medical research literature, in whole or in part, requires more empirical evidence and different inferential models than were used. The claim that “most research findings are false for most research designs and for most fields” must be considered as yet unproven.