1 resultado para bioethics committees
em Central European University - Research Support Scheme
Filtro por publicador
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (9)
- Andina Digital - Repositorio UASB-Digital - Universidade Andina Simón Bolívar (2)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- ArchiMeD - Elektronische Publikationen der Universität Mainz - Alemanha (1)
- Archive of European Integration (60)
- Aston University Research Archive (3)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (4)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (2)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (15)
- Biblioteca Virtual del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía (BV-SSPA), Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud y Bienestar Social, Spain (13)
- Blue Tiger Commons - Lincoln University - USA (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (28)
- Boston College Law School, Boston College (BC), United States (1)
- Brock University, Canada (12)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (13)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (5)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (9)
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (CSUC), Spain (111)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- CUNY Academic Works (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Digital Archives@Colby (2)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons - Montana Tech (3)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (4)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (6)
- Digital Repository at Iowa State University (2)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (3)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (4)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (11)
- Harvard University (3)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (7)
- Instituto Politécnico de Bragança (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (19)
- Memoria Académica - FaHCE, UNLP - Argentina (21)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (1)
- RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (2)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (8)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (4)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositório da Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (ENAP) (1)
- Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp (2)
- Repositório da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES), Brazil (3)
- Repositório de Administração Pública (REPAP) - Direção-Geral da Qualificação dos Trabalhadores em Funções Públicas (INA), Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (14)
- Repositório do Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE - Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, EPE, Portugal (2)
- Repositorio Institucional da UFLA (RIUFLA) (1)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (72)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (7)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Saúde Pública - SP (17)
- Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE) (SIRE), United Kingdom (3)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (18)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (1)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade do Minho (1)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (4)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (12)
- Universidade Metodista de São Paulo (2)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (38)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (90)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (124)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (50)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (2)
Resumo:
The research started with a definition of the general ethical background to be applied in bioethical discussions, particularly regarding aspects of morality that have to be enforced by the community. Only those moral beliefs that can be accepted by consensus in a free discussion can be enforced. It follows that the basic principle of a well ordered society is the equality (and possible upwards extension) of the basic liberties. Therefore, whenever it is possible to respect the principle of autonomy in matters of bioethics (here including questions of abortion, assisted procreation, genetics, organ transplantation and euthanasia) this must be done. On the other hand, there are some common values that can be defended in a free dialogue, values that are needed in order to guarantee stable cooperation in a political society. These values include the respect for human life, which implies the respect for human life in all its forms. This leads to the conclusion that people who are able to be part of the system of cooperation in a political society have rights which are dominant in moral considerations. In all cases where there is no conflict between these rights and the value of life as manifested in human individuals who are not able participate in social cooperation, considerations of the value of the life of the latter must be an important moral consideration. This implies that embryo experimentation should be permitted in order to develop scientific advances needed to save human life, but embryos must not be used for trivial reasons or for the cosmetic industry.