1 resultado para quick response study
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (3)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- Aquatic Commons (11)
- Archive of European Integration (1)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (10)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (5)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) (6)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (4)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (41)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (9)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (42)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (11)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (90)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (8)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- DI-fusion - The institutional repository of Université Libre de Bruxelles (14)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (2)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Diposit Digital de la UB - Universidade de Barcelona (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (1)
- Duke University (13)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (16)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (4)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (26)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (111)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Iowa Publications Online (IPO) - State Library, State of Iowa (Iowa), United States (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Open University Netherlands (1)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (8)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (1)
- QSpace: Queen's University - Canada (1)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (120)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (288)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Aveiro - Portugal (2)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP (2)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (22)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (4)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (4)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (7)
- Universidade Federal do Pará (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (2)
- Université de Montréal (2)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (5)
- University of Canberra Research Repository - Australia (1)
- University of Michigan (11)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (3)
Resumo:
Researchers examining the effects of programs, in this case a state-level pharmaceutical assistance program for the elderly, sometimes must rely on multiple methods of data collection. Two-stage data collection (e.g., a telephone interview followed by a mail questionnaire) was used to obtain a full range of information. Older age groups were found to participate less frequently in the telephone interview, while certain demographic factors characterized mail questionnaire nonparticipants, all of which supports past research. Results also show that those in the poorest health are less likely to participate in the mail survey. Combining the two methods did not result in high attrition, suggesting that innovation can be successfully employed. Knowledge of the bias associated with each method will aid in targeting special groups.