1 resultado para puzzle difficulty
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Repository Napier (1)
- University of Cagliari UniCA Eprints (1)
- ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica - Universidad Europea (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (5)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Aquatic Commons (31)
- Archive of European Integration (6)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (24)
- Aston University Research Archive (4)
- B-Digital - Universidade Fernando Pessoa - Portugal (3)
- Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados (6)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina (5)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (84)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (18)
- Boston University Digital Common (6)
- Brock University, Canada (1)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (15)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (42)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (15)
- Center for Jewish History Digital Collections (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (90)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (10)
- CUNY Academic Works (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (34)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (4)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (3)
- Duke University (8)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (17)
- Funes: Repositorio digital de documentos en Educación Matemática - Colombia (1)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (33)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (59)
- Instituto Politécnico de Viseu (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (1)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Livre Saber - Repositório Digital de Materiais Didáticos - SEaD-UFSCar (1)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (10)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (11)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (3)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (2)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (22)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (342)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (9)
- Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra - Espanha (3)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (6)
- School of Medicine, Washington University, United States (4)
- Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Université de Lausanne, Switzerland (3)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (1)
- University of Michigan (13)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (8)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (1)
Resumo:
Objective This article seeks to explain the puzzle of why incumbents spend so much on campaigns despite most research finding that their spending has almost no effect on voters. Methods The article uses ordinary least squares, instrumental variables, and fixed-effects regression to estimate the impact of incumbent spending on election outcomes. The estimation includes an interaction term between incumbent and challenger spending to allow the effect of incumbent spending to depend on the level of challenger spending. Results The estimation provides strong evidence that spending by the incumbent has a larger positive impact on votes received the more money the challenger spends. Conclusion Campaign spending by incumbents is most valuable in the races where the incumbent faces a serious challenge. Raising large sums of money to be used in close races is thus a rational choice by incumbents.