Microwave-Assisted Phospha-Michael Reactions with Internal Alkenes

The atom efficient phospha-Michael reaction between bis 4-methylphenyl phosphine oxide and several activated internal alkenes has been shown to occur under microwave irradiation without added solvent or catalyst. The alkenes used for this study were ethyl 4-nitrocinnamate, two chalcones ((E)-3-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-1-(4- nitrophenyl)-prop-2-en-1-one and (E)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(3-nitro-phenyl)-prop-2- en-1-one), and 2-phenylmethylene-propanedinitrile. In the case of ethyl 4-nitrocinnamate, reaction with bis 4-methylphenyl phosphine oxide for sixty minutes at 130 °C yielded the desired phospha-Michael product in a 55% yield after purification. Varying the location of the nitro group on the phenyl rings of the chalcones did not seem to have a large effect on their reactivity. By NMR, both chalcones seemed to react to the same extent when the reaction times and temperatures were held constant. Interestingly, a phospha-Michael reaction was observed at a reaction temperature of 65°C for experiments involving 2- phenyl-methylene-propanedinitrile while the other substrates required a reaction temperature of 130 °C. Similar experiments were carried out with bis mesityl phosphine oxide and two internal alkenes: 2-phenylmethylene-propanedinitrile and ethyl-2-cyano-3- methyl-2-butenoate. These experiments did not yield any of the predicted phospha- Michael products, which suggest steric limitations to the Michael donor for this reaction.

Quantifying The Diffusion And Erosion Of Degradable Hydrogels Using A Microfluidic Technique

Hydrogels are composed of cross-linked networks of hydrophilic polymers that are biocompatible due to their high water content. Mass transfer through hydrogels has been suggested as an effective method of drug delivery, specifically in degradable polymers to minimize lasting effects within the body. Diffusion of small molecules in poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEG-DA) and dextran methacrylate (dex-MA) hydrogels was characterized in a microfluidic device and by complementary techniques. Microfluidic devices were prepared by crosslinking a formulation of hydrogel and photo-initiator, with and without visible dye, using photolithography to define a central microchannel. Channel sizes within the devices were approximately 600 ¿m to simulate vessels within the body. The microfluidic technique allows for both image and effluent analyses. To visualize the diffusive behavior within the dextran hydrogel, methylene blue and sulforhodamine 101 dyes were used in both elution and uptake experiments. Three analysis techniques for measuring diffusion coefficients were used to quantify the diffusion of solute in the hydrogel, including optical microscopy, characterization of device effluent, and NMR analyses. The optical microscopy technique analyzes images of the dye diffusion captured by a stereomicroscope to generate dye concentration v. position profiles. The data was fit to a diffusion model to determine diffusion coefficients and the dye release profile. In a typical elution experiment, aqueous solution is pumped through the microchannel and dye diffuses out of the hydrogel and into the aqueous phase. During elution, images are taken at regular time intervals and the effluent was collected. Analysis of the device effluent was performed using ultraviolet-visible (UV/Vis) spectroscopy to determine the effluent dye concentration and thus a short-time diffusion coefficient. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used to determine a free diffusion coefficient of molecules in hydrogel without the effect of a concentration gradient. Diffusion coefficients for methylene blue and sulforhodamine 101 dyes in dex-MA hydrogel calculated using the three analysis methods all agree well. It was determined that utilizing a combination of the three techniques offers greater insight into molecular diffusion in hydrogels than employing each technique individually. The use of the same microfluidic devices used to measure diffusion is explored in the use of studying the degradation of dex-MA hydrogels. By combining what is known about the degradation rate in regards to the effect of pH and crosslinking and the ability to use a dye solution in contrast to establish the hydrogel boundaries could be a novel approach to studying hydrogel degradation.

A Microfluidic Method to Measure Small Molecule Diffusion in Hydrogels

Drug release from a fluid-contacting biomaterial is simulated using a microfluidic device with a channel defined by solute-loaded hydrogel; as water is pumped through the channel, solute transfers from the hydrogel into the water. Optical analysis of in-situ hydrogels, characterization of the microfluidic device effluent, and NMR methods were used to find diffusion coefficients of several dyes (model drugs) in poly( ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEG-DA) hydrogels. Diffusion coefficients for methylene blue and sulforhodamine 101 in PEG-DA calculated using the three methods are in good agreement; both dyes are mobile in the hydrogel and elute from the hydrogel at the aqueous channel interface. However, the dye acid blue 22 deviates from typical diffusion behavior and does not release as expected from the hydrogel. Importantly, only the microfluidic method is capable of detecting this behavior. Characterizing solute diffusion with a combination of NMR, optical and effluent methods offer greater insight into molecular diffusion in hydrogels than employing each technique individually. The NMR method made precise measurements for solute diffusion in all cases. The microfluidic optical method was effective for visualizing diffusion of the optically active solutes. The optical and effluent methods show potential to be used to screen solutes to determine if they elute from a hydrogel in contact with flowing fluid. Our data suggest that when designing a drug delivery device, analyzing the diffusion from the molecular level to the device level is important to establish a complete picture of drug elution, and microfluidic methods to study such diffusion can play a key role. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.