1 resultado para discrete choice experiments
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- JISC Information Environment Repository (1)
- Aberdeen University (6)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (1)
- Acceda, el repositorio institucional de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España (1)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (3)
- Aquatic Commons (27)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (18)
- Aston University Research Archive (5)
- Biblioteca de Teses e Dissertações da USP (1)
- Biblioteca Digital | Sistema Integrado de Documentación | UNCuyo - UNCUYO. UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE CUYO. (1)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (1)
- Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações Eletrônicas da UERJ (6)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (17)
- Brock University, Canada (2)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (32)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (96)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (28)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (36)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (1)
- Cornell: DigitalCommons@ILR (1)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (3)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (2)
- Digital Commons @ Center for the Blue Economy - Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (3)
- Digital Peer Publishing (1)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (2)
- Duke University (6)
- Ecology and Society (1)
- eResearch Archive - Queensland Department of Agriculture; Fisheries and Forestry (17)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (31)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (185)
- Institutional Repository of Leibniz University Hannover (1)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (5)
- Plymouth Marine Science Electronic Archive (PlyMSEA) (5)
- Publishing Network for Geoscientific & Environmental Data (3)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (64)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (272)
- RDBU - Repositório Digital da Biblioteca da Unisinos (1)
- Repositório Científico do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa - Portugal (1)
- Repositorio de la Vicerrectoría de Investigación de la Universidad de Costa Rica (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (8)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade de Brasília (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (12)
- Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellín (1)
- RUN (Repositório da Universidade Nova de Lisboa) - FCT (Faculdade de Cienecias e Technologia), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal (3)
- SAPIENTIA - Universidade do Algarve - Portugal (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (11)
- Universidade Técnica de Lisboa (1)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (1)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Michigan (2)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (4)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (1)
Resumo:
Simulation is an important resource for researchers in diverse fields. However, many researchers have found flaws in the methodology of published simulation studies and have described the state of the simulation community as being in a crisis of credibility. This work describes the project of the Simulation Automation Framework for Experiments (SAFE), which addresses the issues that undermine credibility by automating the workflow in the execution of simulation studies. Automation reduces the number of opportunities for users to introduce error in the scientific process thereby improvingthe credibility of the final results. Automation also eases the job of simulation users and allows them to focus on the design of models and the analysis of results rather than on the complexities of the workflow.