1 resultado para Sociology, Theory and Methods|Sociology, Public and Social Welfare|Sociology, Demography
em Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA
Filtro por publicador
- Repository Napier (2)
- Aberdeen University (2)
- Abertay Research Collections - Abertay University’s repository (1)
- Aberystwyth University Repository - Reino Unido (2)
- Academic Research Repository at Institute of Developing Economies (4)
- AMS Tesi di Dottorato - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (2)
- AMS Tesi di Laurea - Alm@DL - Università di Bologna (1)
- Applied Math and Science Education Repository - Washington - USA (1)
- Aquatic Commons (1)
- Archive of European Integration (9)
- Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación - Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad del País Vasco (1)
- Aston University Research Archive (22)
- Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (6)
- Bioline International (1)
- BORIS: Bern Open Repository and Information System - Berna - Suiça (33)
- Boston University Digital Common (3)
- Brock University, Canada (7)
- Bucknell University Digital Commons - Pensilvania - USA (1)
- CaltechTHESIS (2)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (4)
- CentAUR: Central Archive University of Reading - UK (24)
- Central European University - Research Support Scheme (3)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid Portal (3)
- Clark Digital Commons--knowledge; creativity; research; and innovation of Clark University (1)
- Cochin University of Science & Technology (CUSAT), India (2)
- Collection Of Biostatistics Research Archive (1)
- Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) (19)
- CORA - Cork Open Research Archive - University College Cork - Ireland (4)
- Corvinus Research Archive - The institutional repository for the Corvinus University of Budapest (7)
- Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (1)
- Deakin Research Online - Australia (71)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (1)
- Digital Commons @ DU | University of Denver Research (1)
- Digital Commons @ Winthrop University (1)
- Digital Commons at Florida International University (37)
- Digital Peer Publishing (6)
- DigitalCommons@The Texas Medical Center (54)
- DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Doria (National Library of Finland DSpace Services) - National Library of Finland, Finland (1)
- DRUM (Digital Repository at the University of Maryland) (4)
- Duke University (7)
- Glasgow Theses Service (1)
- Greenwich Academic Literature Archive - UK (1)
- Helda - Digital Repository of University of Helsinki (9)
- Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore - Índia (1)
- Institute of Public Health in Ireland, Ireland (1)
- Instituto Politécnico do Porto, Portugal (2)
- Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada - Lisboa (1)
- Martin Luther Universitat Halle Wittenberg, Germany (1)
- Memorial University Research Repository (1)
- Ministerio de Cultura, Spain (2)
- National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI (1)
- Nottingham eTheses (1)
- Portal de Revistas Científicas Complutenses - Espanha (13)
- QUB Research Portal - Research Directory and Institutional Repository for Queen's University Belfast (70)
- Queensland University of Technology - ePrints Archive (103)
- ReCiL - Repositório Científico Lusófona - Grupo Lusófona, Portugal (1)
- Repositório Alice (Acesso Livre à Informação Científica da Embrapa / Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from Embrapa) (1)
- Repositório Científico da Universidade de Évora - Portugal (1)
- Repositório digital da Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV (4)
- Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (1)
- Repositório Institucional UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho" (5)
- Research Open Access Repository of the University of East London. (1)
- Royal College of Art Research Repository - Uninet Kingdom (1)
- Scielo España (1)
- Scielo Uruguai (1)
- Universidad de Alicante (2)
- Universidad del Rosario, Colombia (1)
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2)
- Universidade Complutense de Madrid (1)
- Universidade de Lisboa - Repositório Aberto (1)
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) (2)
- Universita di Parma (1)
- Universitat de Girona, Spain (1)
- Universitätsbibliothek Kassel, Universität Kassel, Germany (3)
- Université de Montréal (1)
- Université de Montréal, Canada (9)
- University of Michigan (331)
- University of Queensland eSpace - Australia (19)
- University of Southampton, United Kingdom (4)
- University of Washington (1)
- WestminsterResearch - UK (5)
- Worcester Research and Publications - Worcester Research and Publications - UK (2)
Resumo:
The recent rise of the Tea Party movement has added a new dimension to our discussion of domestic politics. The main question is: what effect will the Tea Party have on the political landscape? The best way to answer this question is to place the Tea Party in historical and theoretical context, in order to discuss what type of social movement the Tea Party is and what impact it might have. To this end, I will define and discuss the two major literatures in socialmovement theory: Issue Evolution and Political Process theory. This theoretical framework will provide the basis for a more concrete definition of the Tea Party movement itself. I will attemptto define the Tea Party movement based on its demographics, goals and political successes and will discuss it within the context of this theoretical framework. In addition, I will discuss four landmark social movements within our country’s history through the lens of the theoretical framework. I have found that successful movements rely on a combination of internal organizations and networks and external political opportunities to achieve and maintain nationalrelevance. In the end, I will come to the conclusion that the Tea Party will not likely have a major lasting impact on the political arena. It lacks key parts of the internal structure that makes some movements, such as the Civil Rights movement, so influential. But in the short term it will succeed in pushing the Republican Party towards a more fiscally conservative position.